Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > Themes in History > Speculative History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Speculative History Speculative History Forum - Alternate History, What If Questions, Pseudo History, and anything outside the boundaries of mainstream historical research


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old September 29th, 2009, 01:56 PM   #1
Suspended indefinitely
 
Joined: Jul 2006
From: UK
Posts: 6,114
Vikings vs Aztecs


The year is 900 AD. Three Viking longships returning from a successful raid on Ireland are blown off course. After weeks of sailing they eventually reach land. They set up camp and begin repairing their ships. One day they are confronted by a lot of strange people wearing feathers and jaguar skins and armed with razor sharp cricket bats. The Vikings, who match the Aztecs numerically, don armor, draw swords and form a shield wall...
Who wins?
Nick is offline  
Remove Ads
Old September 29th, 2009, 02:39 PM   #2

Fluffybunny's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Mar 2009
From: Hofheim, Germany
Posts: 1,029
Re: Vikings vs Aztecs


The Aztes have the advantage of home ground and the Vikings would probably collapse from heat exhaustion!
Fluffybunny is offline  
Old September 29th, 2009, 03:09 PM   #3
Suspended indefinitely
 
Joined: Jul 2006
From: UK
Posts: 6,114
Re: Vikings vs Aztecs


Quote:
Originally Posted by Fluffybunny View Post
The Aztes have the advantage of home ground and the Vikings would probably collapse from heat exhaustion!
Viking mercenaries did rather well when they fought for the Byzantines.
Nick is offline  
Old September 29th, 2009, 04:35 PM   #4
Suspended indefinitely
 
Joined: Jan 2008
From: Chile, Santiago
Posts: 2,831
Re: Vikings vs Aztecs


You should make a difference between Norse and Vikings. The guys that came to the Americas were Norse, common folks, with not that much military training, that had quite a lot of problems with the locals... They hardly would have defeated Aztecs. Now, if the same Vikings that were fighting in Europe had moved to the Americas things may have been different.

May, because Spanish success was based on diplomacy as much as military power. These Norse would need a guy equivalent to Cortes, with his same political skills, to have a chance to succeed.
pinguin is offline  
Old September 29th, 2009, 05:37 PM   #5

Jomsvikingr's Avatar
Lecturer
 
Joined: Sep 2009
From: United States
Posts: 276
Re: Vikings vs Aztecs


The Vikings were common folk too, pinguin. Norse farmers and the like who went on a raid. So really, the people who came to the Americas were vikings.

The vikings would win, hands down.
The Aztecs had little armor and the weapon tech was just not as adavanced though that itsn't to say that the Macuahuitl wasn't a fearsome weapon. I just think that the Norse would of been better equiped with their steel swords, leather or chain armor, sheilds, and not to forget the somewhat fabled viking axe! All agaisnt the unarmored, less technologicaly advance Aztecs.

The Aztecs would probably win if there was an all out war, vikings would be too far away to come immediatly for reinforcements, but in just one pitched battle I would give it to the vikings hands down.
Jomsvikingr is offline  
Old September 29th, 2009, 05:49 PM   #6
Suspended indefinitely
 
Joined: Jun 2009
From: Loudonville, NY, and soon: St. Petersburg, RF
Posts: 3,106
Re: Vikings vs Aztecs


I'd love to see an aztec with wooden and rock tools fight a viking with metal armor, axe, sword, helmet, and reach advantage, and height advantage. Pretty sure it would be a slaughter, and the vikings would win, but you never know...the underdog has won before.
Wobomagonda is offline  
Old September 29th, 2009, 05:51 PM   #7
Suspended indefinitely
 
Joined: Jan 2008
From: Chile, Santiago
Posts: 2,831
Re: Vikings vs Aztecs


Vikings had a change in Greenland and Newfoundland, and they ended up with arrows in theirs asses.
pinguin is offline  
Old September 29th, 2009, 05:53 PM   #8
Suspended indefinitely
 
Joined: Jun 2009
From: Loudonville, NY, and soon: St. Petersburg, RF
Posts: 3,106
Re: Vikings vs Aztecs


that was a small expedition of like 15 vikings, hardly constitutes a defeat.
Wobomagonda is offline  
Old September 29th, 2009, 05:56 PM   #9
Suspended indefinitely
 
Joined: Jun 2009
From: Loudonville, NY, and soon: St. Petersburg, RF
Posts: 3,106
Re: Vikings vs Aztecs


That is like saying the Natives beat the Spanish because Columbus didn't conquer them with his crew of less than 500 men...it's an absurd notion.
Wobomagonda is offline  
Old September 29th, 2009, 06:06 PM   #10
Suspended indefinitely
 
Joined: Jan 2008
From: Chile, Santiago
Posts: 2,831
Re: Vikings vs Aztecs


Quote:
Originally Posted by Wobomagonda View Post
that was a small expedition of like 15 vikings, hardly constitutes a defeat.
Curious. I never knew that only 15 Norse conquered Greenland...

The simply fact is that Norse failed were Inuits and Amerindians succeed.
pinguin is offline  
Reply

  Historum > Themes in History > Speculative History

Tags
aztecs, vikings


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vikings vs Mongols. Komroden Speculative History 26 February 15th, 2011 04:47 AM
Those Vikings: What was THAT all about? DesertPilot European History 99 April 2nd, 2010 04:49 PM
Vikings vs Maoris Lucius Speculative History 14 January 9th, 2010 05:51 AM
The Aztecs & Human sacrifice RoyalHill1987 American History 40 November 5th, 2008 06:18 AM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.