Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > Themes in History > War and Military History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

War and Military History War and Military History Forum - Warfare, Tactics, and Military Technology over the centuries


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 1st, 2018, 05:43 AM   #1
Citizen
 
Joined: Nov 2014
From: ph
Posts: 45
How inferior were monkey model Soviet weapons?


Compared to the ones the Soviets used?
ren0312 is offline  
Remove Ads
Old January 1st, 2018, 12:32 PM   #2

Ichon's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Mar 2013
From: .
Posts: 3,130

It is difficult to find more than a handful of conclusive examples of monkey models and Suvorov who popularized this idea isn't very reliable though looking at U.S. arms exports there are definitely many times 'lesser' models are exported though usually the removed or obsolete equipment is focused on electronics, sensors, guidance systems and that sort of thing where Suvorov was claiming major systems were missing such as tanks without automatic loaders, or anti-recoil systems and even with stripped armor or different armor.

It might well be true in some instances but during late 1990s when U.S. got access compare some of the 'improved' versions of Soviet models vs the exported monkey models it was quite rare to find major differences though similar to U.S. not including modern electronics Soviets also did this as well not giving some of the more current penetrating ammunitions with tungsten or uranium.

Bigger cause of underperformance was training and maintenance where Soviet advisors might have trained friendly states up to 80% of the level of a good Soviet technician and the handful of thusly trained technicians passed on their knowledge to an even lower level for the next cadre.

The main exception seems to have been for foreign pilots who trained with Soviet Air Forces often for several months could be quite good but their maintenance crews and some of the weapons they were provided were subpar though they still managed sometimes good performances despite those shortcomings.
Ichon is offline  
Old January 1st, 2018, 01:51 PM   #3

sailorsam's Avatar
Lecturer
 
Joined: Oct 2016
From: Merryland
Posts: 409

guy on the radio used to joke that Gorbachev flew on a Tupelov plane with technology stolen from Boeing.

story I heard;
sometime in the 1990s we got hold of some Soviet radio gear (from a downed plane, maybe a defector, maybe from a tank) and were impressed at their solid-state-transistor technology. obviously they wanted hardened equipment that would survive nuclear EMP.

turns out they just hadn't figured out how to digitalize stuff yet.
sailorsam is offline  
Old January 2nd, 2018, 02:57 AM   #4

starman's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Jan 2014
From: Connecticut
Posts: 3,041

Quote:
Originally Posted by ren0312 View Post
Compared to the ones the Soviets used?
If memory serves, after the 1982 war Syria got the T-72A, but only in exchange for important captured enemy stuff. Iraq, which lacked such a bargaining chip, had to make do with the T-72M, and was utterly slaughtered in '91.
starman is online now  
Reply

  Historum > Themes in History > War and Military History

Tags
inferior, model, monkey, soviet, weapons



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Were Soviet weapons and technology inferior? Menshevik War and Military History 246 October 8th, 2016 01:13 AM
Current US weapons that are inferior to their international counterparts Mrbsct War and Military History 89 April 17th, 2015 06:45 PM
Monkey experiment Solidaire Philosophy, Political Science, and Sociology 7 March 1st, 2012 11:16 AM
Soviet pilots were inferior to the RAF pilots in WW II? serhi War and Military History 285 April 17th, 2011 07:38 AM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.