 | | War and Military History War and Military History Forum - Warfare, Tactics, and Military Technology over the centuries |
June 26th, 2011, 08:15 AM
|
#21 | | None shall pass!
Joined: Aug 2010 From: Somewhere in France(for now) Posts: 6,554 |
the weather was a major factor, IIRC a heavy storm picked up in the channel shortly after the landings which would have screwed everything up had they invaded then
| | |
| |
June 26th, 2011, 11:07 AM
|
#22 | | Creature of the Night
Joined: Nov 2007 From: Alba Posts: 7,628 | Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmo The success of the Normandy invasion was only because of overwhelming manpower | Quite simply, no.
While there were situations where overwhelming manpower was actually achievable, these were few and far between. The Allies undoubtedly had more men overall, but however many men they had wouldn't have mattered had the Atlantic Wall been operational.
| | |
| |
June 26th, 2011, 11:19 AM
|
#23 | | Historian
Joined: Dec 2010 From: Near St. Louis. Posts: 3,914 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolling Blockhead While much is made of Hitler not releasing other forces to intervene at Normandy, I'm not sure how much difference they would have made. Managing to arrive in any shape to fight after an extended approach march through the fire of battleships would have been an impressive feat. | The Allied airforces were attacking individual cars and groups of men as small as five. Rommel got attacked while traveling unescorted in his auto. A large concentration of armor or troops would have drawn Typhoons and Thunderbolts in droves. Dispersal was the only thing that allowed some Germans to survive.
| | |
| |
June 26th, 2011, 11:20 AM
|
#24 | | Academician
Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 50 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Chookie Quite simply, no.
While there were situations where overwhelming manpower was actually achievable, these were few and far between. The Allies undoubtedly had more men overall, but however many men they had wouldn't have mattered had the Atlantic Wall been operational. | I see that as irrelevant to the original question. The question was not about what would have happened if condition X existed but whether there was anything that overwhelming manpower could not account for. Since an operational Atlantic Wall did not occur, it is not applicable to the question.
| | |
| |
June 26th, 2011, 11:26 AM
|
#25 | | Southern Unionist
Joined: Aug 2010 From: VA Posts: 5,260 |
I'd say good logistics, operational planning, and execution factored in.
| | |
| |
June 26th, 2011, 11:34 AM
|
#26 | | Academician
Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 50 | Quote:
Originally Posted by irishcrusader95 the weather was a major factor, IIRC a heavy storm picked up in the channel shortly after the landings which would have screwed everything up had they invaded then | While I agree, I seem to have lost the connection. Are you simply saying this as one of the addition factors that led to the allied victory, or something that could not be explained by overwhelming manpower? Since it didn't occur, I think it non sequiter to the question.
| | |
| |
June 26th, 2011, 11:36 AM
|
#27 | | Academician
Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 50 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Viperlord I'd say good logistics, operational planning, and execution factored in. | I don't think that is revelant to the original question. Perhaps I am missing something. If the allies had overwhelming manpower, I would maintain that good logistics is a given. Even with poor operation planning or poor exection, given a sufficient number of troops, the allies would have one anyway.
| | |
| |
June 26th, 2011, 11:41 AM
|
#28 | | Historian
Joined: Dec 2010 From: Near St. Louis. Posts: 3,914 |
Anybody got hard numbers for us concerning troops in place vs. troops invading?
Also, are we talking local superiority or the total number of troops available on either side up to the point where the invasion as declared "over" and the operations moved to the next stages?
| | |
| |
June 26th, 2011, 11:47 AM
|
#29 | | Lecturer
Joined: Feb 2011 Posts: 469 |
Overwhelming manpower meant nothing on a cross channel invasion without the means to actually get them across and re-supply them with all the paraphernalia of war.
Ships, boats, harbour, armour, fuel, food, munitions, arty, air support, naval gunfire and on and on.
| | |
| |
June 26th, 2011, 11:49 AM
|
#30 | | Lecturer
Joined: Feb 2011 Posts: 469 | Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmo I don't think that is revelant to the original question. Perhaps I am missing something. If the allies had overwhelming manpower, I would maintain that good logistics is a given. Even with poor operation planning or poor exection, given a sufficient number of troops, the allies would have one anyway. | The Soviets had an overwhelming amount of manpower and equipment in 1941, did not do them much good though as they lacked alot of other things.
| | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.
|  |