Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > Themes in History > War and Military History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

War and Military History War and Military History Forum - Warfare, Tactics, and Military Technology over the centuries


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old December 20th, 2011, 08:33 AM   #1

Brisieis's Avatar
Historian
Member of the Year
 
Joined: Sep 2011
From: Egotistical.Apes.Ruining.This.Habitat
Posts: 17,270
Blog Entries: 8
How important was the role of Africa in World War Two?


I have recently been learning about Operation Pedestal, I wrote a brief few words about it on my blog because I found it so very interesting. It got me more interested in the parts of the world that we do not immediately think of when we hear about world war two.

How important was the role of Africa in world war two?
Brisieis is offline  
Remove Ads
Old December 20th, 2011, 08:42 AM   #2

Robert165's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Jan 2010
From: Brooklyn
Posts: 3,030

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brisieis View Post
I have recently been learning about Operation Pedestal, I wrote a brief few words about it on my blog because I found it so very interesting. It got me more interested in the parts of the world that we do not immediately think of when we hear about world war two.

How important was the role of Africa in world war two?
Do you mean african fighting forces or africa as a geographical/tactical fighting field? Or both?
Robert165 is offline  
Old December 20th, 2011, 08:43 AM   #3

Brisieis's Avatar
Historian
Member of the Year
 
Joined: Sep 2011
From: Egotistical.Apes.Ruining.This.Habitat
Posts: 17,270
Blog Entries: 8

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert165 View Post
Do you mean african fighting forces or africa as a geographical/tactical fighting field? Or both?
Both.
Brisieis is offline  
Old December 20th, 2011, 08:51 AM   #4

Robert165's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Jan 2010
From: Brooklyn
Posts: 3,030

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brisieis View Post
Both.
look at rommel vs patton, idk, have you doenthat yet?
Robert165 is offline  
Old December 20th, 2011, 10:13 AM   #5

irishcrusader95's Avatar
None shall pass!
 
Joined: Aug 2010
From: Ireland
Posts: 6,729
Blog Entries: 4

it tied up a lot of german forces and resources which would have been better employed on the eastern front, while the forces in africa only consisted of a single corps but the constant replacements and supplies that were sent there was a wast on objectives that would achieve them little even if the did reach the Suez canal. its importance for the british is that it gave them a victory which they sorely needed for the many let downs of the past few years and gave there army much needed combat experience making them better prepared for the invasions of mainland europe.
irishcrusader95 is offline  
Old December 20th, 2011, 10:47 AM   #6

Chookie's Avatar
Creature of the Night
 
Joined: Nov 2007
From: Alba
Posts: 7,628
Blog Entries: 15

It was, in many ways, crucial. Leaving aside the Western Desert Theatre and the US adventures in Morocco, Africa provided men and munitions, access to the middle-eastern oil fields, naval bases, port and Rest and recreation facilities for troops and the Suez Canal.
Chookie is offline  
Old December 21st, 2011, 08:03 AM   #7
Archivist
 
Joined: Dec 2011
From: N. Ireland
Posts: 206

Rommel vs PATTON????

I think you'll find that Patton was a very minor player at the very end of the N. African campaign, where Rommel fought various British Generals for over 2 years, until overwhelmed by Montgomery at El Alamein.
Giraffe is offline  
Old December 21st, 2011, 04:06 PM   #8

Rakkasan's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 727

A dress rehearsal for allied large scale amphibious landing...and taking Italy out of the war eventually.
Rakkasan is offline  
Old December 21st, 2011, 06:22 PM   #9
Academician
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 98

It was necessary to show America what the Brits had already learned about fighting the Germans. Counter-historically, I wonder how the raw but fresh US troops would have been chewed up had they faced a European invasion instead of the training ground of Vichy Africa.
parallel is offline  
Old December 21st, 2011, 06:38 PM   #10
Lecturer
 
Joined: Dec 2011
From: Minnesota
Posts: 348

I think Germany would have been better served to have Italian, as well as Arab force's take the lead in Africa and would have left Rommel out of the theater of operation.
For one it is too unimportant a theater to risk tarnishing his thereby Germany's honor by losing a major campaign. Also his superb and swift use of armor would have been better suited for the Soviet plain's and may have turned the tide if utilized in that theater instead.
Trout Bum is offline  
Reply

  Historum > Themes in History > War and Military History

Tags
africa, important, role, war


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Impact of Colonization/Decolonization of South Africa on current day South Africa? iMax History Help 0 October 24th, 2011 06:13 PM
Role Of Government Robespierre Philosophy, Political Science, and Sociology 3 June 15th, 2011 11:25 AM
Who do you think is the most important person in world history? Ian The Poet General History 36 November 19th, 2009 06:17 PM
Most important event in the history of the world? red4tribe General History 23 September 5th, 2009 12:09 PM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.