Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > Themes in History > War and Military History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

War and Military History War and Military History Forum - Warfare, Tactics, and Military Technology over the centuries


View Poll Results: Who Do You Beleive Had The Best Army?
Soviet Union 42 13.21%
Germany 153 48.11%
America 73 22.96%
Great Britian 15 4.72%
Australia 1 0.31%
Japan 3 0.94%
Italy 3 0.94%
Finland 15 4.72%
Rumania 1 0.31%
France 0 0%
China 0 0%
Poland 4 1.26%
Canada 5 1.57%
Bulgaria 3 0.94%
Voters: 318. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old March 31st, 2017, 10:04 PM   #661

Lord Fairfax's Avatar
Tickling the Dragons tail
 
Joined: Jan 2015
From: Rupert's Land ;)
Posts: 2,486

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam-Nary View Post
But then, the Wehrmacht is is army, air force, navy, and any other component of the German military in WW2.

And given that there was no major "Western Front" between June 1940 and June 1944 and that the Mediterranean was a minor theater for them with only one corps sent initially and that strength only marginally increased by the eve of El Alamein in 1942... It should be safe to say that for most of the war, most of the German army was committed to the Eastern Front.
Actually no, you'd think so, but in fact not the case.

This is also a fallacy that people use when they want to massage the numbers, usually to try to prove that the Soviets won the war singlehandedly.
(Not accusing you of that, but do look very carefully at the numbers before passing judgement)

The fact is that the efforts of British bombing required the Germans to maintain a million men+ in the west for civil defence, firefighting, rescue, repair etc, not to mention another million or so of LW, AA battalions and other armed forces.
Had there been no war between Germany and the British Empire, these men wouldn't have been sitting around in the beer garden enjoying pilsner & schnitzel, there'd have been millions more men available for the eastern front.

And for the record, there was a "Western Front" in 1941 fought by the British & Allies - in Greece & Yugoslavia (well, more like a Southern front)
So the bulk of the German army faces the British/Aussies/Greek/Yugoslavs for the first half of 1941, and the Soviets for the second half.
In 1943 the Axis have diverted almost 40 divisions to the Med, so far, far more than just the Africa Korps.
As for 1942, by Nov 1942 the Axis have not "marginally increased" their numbers, there are a half million men either in Africa, or on their way there, all of who will never return to Europe.
Not as many as in the USSR, but not insignificant either.

Last edited by Lord Fairfax; March 31st, 2017 at 10:06 PM.
Lord Fairfax is offline  
Remove Ads
Old April 1st, 2017, 02:47 AM   #662
Scholar
 
Joined: Apr 2016
From: Netherlands
Posts: 865

People also forget the huge amount of resources and fuel the Germans spend on the battle of the Atlantic. They build over a thousand submarines, with accompanying crew and logistics.

As a crude estimate (just using wiki reichmarks costs, comparing wartime costs is always tricky) a type VII submarine costs about as much as 35 Panther tanks.
CPTANT is offline  
Old April 5th, 2017, 06:25 PM   #663
Historian
 
Joined: Jul 2013
From: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 8,520

Quote:
Originally Posted by Menshevik View Post
You're right. I did not know about this "drop". As it was, it was a botch from beginning to end because the units were literally cobbled together in great haste, had no unit cohesion and in fact, most of the troops did not know each other and had no experience working together and included many, if not most, soldiers who had never even jumped out of an airplane before. Not to mention using very inexperienced pilots who had little to none experience flying in formation in the middle of a snow storm, no less. It would have been better if the mission had never taken place at all. Such is war...

Last edited by royal744; April 5th, 2017 at 06:28 PM.
royal744 is offline  
Old April 5th, 2017, 06:55 PM   #664
Suspended indefinitely
 
Joined: Feb 2017
From: Cardiff,UK
Posts: 373

Hitler's Messing with his own army I believe gives the US/UK a lead. The Dilution of Divisions,Major Strategy Mistakes and so on
Conrad von Hotzendorf is offline  
Reply

  Historum > Themes in History > War and Military History

Tags
army, ww2



Search tags for this page
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Macedonian Army vs Assyrian Army(late 8th/early 7th century BC) Alcibiades War and Military History 3 June 1st, 2012 01:44 PM
Carthaginian Army or Roman Army? Mohammed the Persian Ancient History 25 October 14th, 2011 05:21 PM
US Continental Army: A Mercenary army? Mohammed the Persian American History 14 July 1st, 2011 12:07 PM
Roman Army under Caesar vs Japanese army under Tokugawa Arkkataka Speculative History 15 April 6th, 2011 03:27 PM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.