 |
May 15th, 2011, 10:28 PM
|
#21 | | Scholar
Joined: Jan 2011 From: Podolia Posts: 845 |
Why are not listed Soviet semi-automatic rifle SVT? Soviet self-loading rifles (AVS-36, SVT-38 SVT-40), did not yield to the American M1 Garand and clearly superior to the later German G.41 (M) and G.41 (W) | | |
| |
May 15th, 2011, 10:50 PM
|
#22 | | Quixotic Jedi
Joined: Apr 2011 From: The True Capital of China Posts: 5,299 | Quote:
Originally Posted by serhi Why are not listed Soviet semi-automatic rifle SVT? Soviet self-loading rifles (AVS-36, SVT-38 SVT-40), did not yield to the American M1 Garand and clearly superior to the later German G.41 (M) and G.41 (W)  | Because the M! Garand is the rifle that won the war. Besides it was much more beautiful. | | |
| |
May 15th, 2011, 10:57 PM
|
#23 | | Quixotic Jedi
Joined: Apr 2011 From: The True Capital of China Posts: 5,299 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Stanbery The M-1 Carbine might have been a contender if only the round would have had more punch? | I love this rifle. I have one made in 1943 by General Motors. | | |
| |
May 15th, 2011, 11:17 PM
|
#24 | | .
Joined: Dec 2010 From: The Netherlands Posts: 5,194 |
so you are letting people choose between a semi automatic rifle or a bolt action rifle?
bad comparison? Its possible to comparing the Lee Enfield and the Springfield is but if I gave you the choice between a martin henry and a Berthier rifle you would pick the Berthier rifle!
But I would still choose the Lee Enfield ^^
And if I had a choice in all infantry guns of ww2 I would pick the lovely Bren LMG
Accuracy and fire-power in a great combination | | |
| |
May 15th, 2011, 11:19 PM
|
#25 | | .
Joined: Dec 2010 From: The Netherlands Posts: 5,194 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Wenge Because the M! Garand is the rifle that won the war. Besides it was much more beautiful.
|
oooh yes and it has that splendit PING! when your out of ammo
its a bit like holding up a sign like this: | | |
| |
May 15th, 2011, 11:22 PM
|
#26 | | Quixotic Jedi
Joined: Apr 2011 From: The True Capital of China Posts: 5,299 | Quote:
Originally Posted by bartieboy oooh yes and it has that splendit PING! when your out of ammo
its a bit like holding up a sign like this:  | Okay, and what did you do in the war Daddy?
| | |
| |
May 15th, 2011, 11:25 PM
|
#27 | | .
Joined: Dec 2010 From: The Netherlands Posts: 5,194 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Wenge Okay, and what did you do in the war Daddy? | I was still only DNA 
And Im glad I was.
( I was born 48 years after the end of the war)
| | |
| |
May 15th, 2011, 11:26 PM
|
#28 | | Quixotic Jedi
Joined: Apr 2011 From: The True Capital of China Posts: 5,299 | Quote:
Originally Posted by bartieboy I was still only DNA 
And Im glad I was.
( I was born 48 years after the end of the war) | I just wanted to make certain you were an expert on the M1 Garand.
| | |
| |
May 15th, 2011, 11:49 PM
|
#29 | | .
Joined: Dec 2010 From: The Netherlands Posts: 5,194 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Wenge I just wanted to make certain you were an expert on the M1 Garand. |
nope, Im not and I dont have to be to know that most people I know who like it like it because they don't know its counterparts like the Gewehr 43 or the SKS
| | |
| |
May 15th, 2011, 11:56 PM
|
#30 | | Historian
Joined: Apr 2011 From: Melbourne Australia Posts: 1,461 |
I'd go with the Lee Enfield and Bren, the Bren especially. Solid, not given to stoppages even when choked in mud and accurate. I have used them in serious business.
Two things Wenge. One you make a sweeping statement that the Garand won the war. then you asked Bartieboy what he did in the war. I take it you speak from experience.
But I think we would be bound to disagree, based on your avatar
| | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.
|  |