Historum - History Forums

Historum - History Forums (http://historum.com/)
-   War and Military History (http://historum.com/war-military-history/)
-   -   Its a bit funny how people make fun of the French military (http://historum.com/war-military-history/98358-its-bit-funny-how-people-make-fun-french-military.html)

Balian December 16th, 2015 01:45 PM

Its a bit funny how people make fun of the French military
 
I mean considering that they have the best military record of any European country. In 800 years France has won 132 wars, lost 43 and drawn 10, making them the most successful nation in the history of Europe military wise.

It seems to me that some people base all of French military history on World War II.

Look it up. Its true

A Vietnamese December 16th, 2015 05:56 PM

Not important at all. We all know how awesome the Mongols were, look at them now. Lets talk again when France achieves an awesome feat or two in the next war.

phil1904 December 16th, 2015 07:01 PM

So what!:laugh:
It's not the end of the world!:)
It's true that some people enjoy sometime to joke sacarstically about French military history maybe by pettiness either because they don't know it or for another reasons (for instance"nationalist" history education)....etc.
It's no big deal, it doesn't matter, take it easy :D.
That is important is not to let some go to far in order not to allow them to falsify history.
Many cliché exist about many other people.

@To Vietnamese
Chao anh :rolleyes:

Sam-Nary December 16th, 2015 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A Vietnamese (Post 2392102)
Not important at all. We all know how awesome the Mongols were, look at them now. Lets talk again when France achieves an awesome feat or two in the next war.

They fought well in Afghanistan as part of Operation Enduring Freedom...

They achieved full success in Mali in removing a Al Qaeda affiliated organization and did so without becoming embroiled in the sort of insurrections that turned America's Iraq War into a Pyrrhic victory.

They were the leaders in the bombing campaign against Gaddafi in Libya.

And are presently involved in the bombing of ISIS targets in Syria, particularly after the attacks on Paris.

pablo668 December 16th, 2015 09:34 PM

One only had to look at Verdun really.
Surely one of the bloodiest and worst battles that have ever been.
They withstood the attack and held their ground.

In WWII the French were hamstrung really. Divided amongst themselves, many didn't want another war. Unsurprising considering the wreck the last one had made of the country.

A Vietnamese December 16th, 2015 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam-Nary (Post 2392133)
They fought well in Afghanistan as part of Operation Enduring Freedom...

They achieved full success in Mali in removing a Al Qaeda affiliated organization and did so without becoming embroiled in the sort of insurrections that turned America's Iraq War into a Pyrrhic victory.

They were the leaders in the bombing campaign against Gaddafi in Libya.

And are presently involved in the bombing of ISIS targets in Syria, particularly after the attacks on Paris.

I prefer to call what you have just listed as "armed conflict" and "military operation".

Cornelis December 16th, 2015 09:57 PM

Quote:

I prefer to call what you have just listed as "armed conflict" and "military operation".
And what makes a "war" something so different of "armed conflict led by military forces" ? Sure, there is no formal declaration of war, but there were none since the end of WW2 and yet we talk of Algerian War, Falklands War or Iraq War.

Karl XII December 16th, 2015 10:06 PM

Also when you consider the fact that it took the United Kingdom, Russia, Austria, Prussia, Spain, Sweden, Portugal and other minor states to defeat Napoleonic France it really puts things into perspective.

Sam-Nary December 16th, 2015 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A Vietnamese (Post 2392188)
I prefer to call what you have just listed as "armed conflict" and "military operation".

So... when France loses, it's a war... but when they win it's nothing much...

Sounds like facts and data are being "fixed" to suit a predetermined outcome.

Any conflict in which military forces are engaged in combat, regardless of whether or not war was declared, is war, pure and simple. Trying to list actions in which France's military has played at least a supporting combat if not a leading role as something other than war is to belittle the conflict in question...

Especially when many of the recent actions have actually invoked NATO's rules regarding war and the alliance... A NATO nation has only been attacked to the point where the Alliance has treated it as an act of war and responded to the aid of the nation attacked. The first was in response to the 9/11 attacks on the US and I believe NATO recently voted to treat the attacks on Paris in the same way.

The war may not be the conventional sort of war that we saw in even Vietnam or Gulf War I, but it is warfare nonetheless...

Bares December 16th, 2015 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam-Nary (Post 2392200)
So... when France loses, it's a war... but when they win it's nothing much...

Sounds like facts and data are being "fixed" to suit a predetermined outcome.

Any conflict in which military forces are engaged in combat, regardless of whether or not war was declared, is war, pure and simple. Trying to list actions in which France's military has played at least a supporting combat if not a leading role as something other than war is to belittle the conflict in question...

Especially when many of the recent actions have actually invoked NATO's rules regarding war and the alliance... A NATO nation has only been attacked to the point where the Alliance has treated it as an act of war and responded to the aid of the nation attacked. The first was in response to the 9/11 attacks on the US and I believe NATO recently voted to treat the attacks on Paris in the same way.

The war may not be the conventional sort of war that we saw in even Vietnam or Gulf War I, but it is warfare nonetheless...

Yeah but one has to note the numbers involved. You cant treat all military operations the same - Sweden supposedly operated in the Congo but guess what it was a very minor force we sent, likewise the French only had some 3000 men in Mali so its hardly the same kind of operation as the Gulf War, Iraq or Afghanistan. Another defining difference between the USA in Iraq and France in Mali was that the latter was invited to help and fought alongside the African Union and the military of Mali.

Not that I am saying the French cant fight, but keep the above in mind.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:11 AM.


Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.