I read somewhere that some rifles were picked up on the battlefield with as many as 8 Bullits in the barrel .I wonder how many rifles were picked up with burst barrels ?very time consuming If you're in combat
That's why you clean your piece before you eat.very time consuming If you're in combat
The patch was to contain the round and the powder. If you're firing hot you don't worry about accidently titling the barrel and having the ball roll out.I read somewhere that some rifles were picked up on the battlefield with as many as 8 Bullits in the barrel .I wonder how many rifles were picked up with burst barrels ?
I think it was normal carry 60 rounds and I am pretty sure at some point troops would have to run a patch through the barrel ?
The patch was to contain the round and the powder. If you're firing hot you don't worry about accidently titling the barrel and having the ball roll
Interesting . I recently read Washington’s Crossing and there was a lot of firing yes they likely had fouled musket barrelsIn Philadelphia there's a museum called the Chew House which the British turned into a fort during the Battle of Germantown (1777). At one point on the floor there are several overlapping circles or arcs approx. 3/4 of an inch in diameter. They were burned into the floor by a hot musket barrel when a British soldier had to stop in mid battle and clear his barrel of powder residue by turning his musket upside down and tapping the muzzle on the floor. The hot barrel indicates it was done in mid battle, but may have been only one soldier whose musket required that kind of attention. Maybe the other soldiers took better care of their guns and kept them cleaner between battles?
Good point !The patch was to contain the round and the powder. If you're firing hot you don't worry about accidently titling the barrel and having the ball roll out.
You don't stop and do a full cleaning during battle. In the Civil War, ammunition packets of 10 or 12 rounds often included a "William's Cleaner Round", a bullet with a zinc (?) disc at the base, that would help clean out some of the fouling. Remember, these are "Minie balls", conical bullets that fit loosely in the bore, but with a hollow base that would expand upon firing, engaging the rifling with a tighter fit. So some fouling wasn't really an issue.very time consuming If you're in combat
yeah you don't think I know that only a autistic insane person would try to clean there rifle with the enemy fireing bullets at you well its eithier that your a neat freak Im just saying cleaning your rifle in general is time consumeingYou don't stop and do a full cleaning during battle. In the Civil War, ammunition packets of 10 or 12 rounds often included a "William's Cleaner Round", a bullet with a zinc (?) disc at the base, that would help clean out some of the fouling. Remember, these are "Minie balls", conical bullets that fit loosely in the bore, but with a hollow base that would expand upon firing, engaging the rifling with a tighter fit. So some fouling wasn't really an issue.
In the same way, smoothbores firing round ball used a smaller diameter than the bore, again to ensure fast loading even with quite a bit of residue build-up. There was usually not a separate patch, instead the paper of the cartridge was left on the ball to serve as wadding. And if you want to clear excessive fouling from the bore, yes, you can run the ramrod down the bore and then rap the muzzle on a hard surface to knock some of the crud out.
Matthew
Um, "very time consuming If you're in combat" *did* sound to me as if you meant "in combat", so I hope you'll forgive me if I misunderstood.yeah you don't think I know that only a autistic insane person would try to clean there rifle with the enemy fireing bullets at you well its eithier that your a neat freak Im just saying cleaning your rifle in general is time consumeing
About as long as it will take you to figure out a proper understanding of time. last time I checked 15 minutes Is long enough for you to get shot by a lead bullet and dieUm, "very time consuming If you're in combat" *did* sound to me as if you meant "in combat", so I hope you'll forgive me if I misunderstood.
Otherwise, no, you can strip down a musket and give it a good cleaning in about 15 minutes. I suspect cleaning a modern rifle takes as long, maybe longer if a sergeant is standing over you screaming about every spot you missed. Since MUCH of a soldier's life is spent cleaning *something*, that's not so bad.
How long will it take to clean up that disrespectful attitude of yours? Or your spelling?
Matthew
especially in the hornets nestAbout as long as it will take you to figure out a proper understanding of time. last time I checked 15 minutes Is long enough for you to get shot by a lead bullet and die
What are you going on about, in such a rude way? I thought you were trying to imply that cleaning a musket takes too long *in combat*, and I said, No, they did not try to clean them in combat, i.e., while bullets are flying. (Except possibly trying to knock some fouling out quickly, which takes only seconds.) You replied very rudely that you did not mean cleaning during combat. I replied that "Otherwise" it only took about 15 minutes to clean a musket, meaning NOT while fighting. You now see to be talking again about cleaning during combat. If you can't understand English, I'm not sure I can help you.About as long as it will take you to figure out a proper understanding of time. last time I checked 15 minutes Is long enough for you to get shot by a lead bullet and die
Or to be suspended by a mod ...About as long as it will take you to figure out a proper understanding of time. last time I checked 15 minutes Is long enough for you to get shot by a lead bullet and die
Not just a Civil War thing. Shooting a Martini Henry with actual blackpowder makes it unworkable after about fifteen rounds.Hog bristle brush following boiling water down the tube. The quality powder they had then would gum up the barrel something awful. Tried some replica formula powder* once, three rounds and my fun was over.
*Said that on the can, no guarantee it was actually same formulation.