Are all sexual taboos just a matter of ickyness? I mean liberals often say that the taboo against male homosexuality is due to the yuck factor, but does not that apply to bestiality also. I mean having sex with animals philosophically may be about consent. But this seems like a flimsy rationalization unless using animals for food, keeping them in factory farms, for horse racing, or for medical experiments is somehow better than using them for sex? And the vast majority of people who have a problem with homosexuality would have no problems with eating animals, or using medicine that has been experimented on animals if it would save their skin. Likewise for incest, people use genetic problems as an excuse when to be frank people just find it icky, since genetic problems can be avoided with condoms, and yet people still find it icky.