This is not correct. Political correctness is just a term used by social conservatives (note the small 'c') to denigrate or mock any changes which they don't like. Those changes take various forms but are especially easily observed in the UK's growing corpus of anti-discrimination legislation. This has developed slowly since the late 60s/early 70s and has been actively promoted by political parties of all colours. Indeed, one of the most significant pieces of legislation that was designed to protect the rights of those accused of crimes (the Police and Criminal Evidence Act) was the brainchild or Margaret Thatcher's Tories. And I don't suppose there are many who'd rush to call her a leftie...In the UK it is the left that has been the pre-eminent voice of radicalism and all things "PC" in academia and local government for many decades.
Hardline Trots are, thankfully, pretty rare in the UK. The rise of Momentum (a Labour party lobby group) has given the hard left a bit of a fillip, but as history shows us, Trots are not the people to go to if you care much about human rights. In fact, Trots like to see themselves as the big champions of the oppressed masses, which gives them an agenda diametrically opposed to the one that Corvidius would assign them.But when I say "left", I don't mean those who are of, or for the Labour Party, but the hardline trots and fellow travellers. In fact for me the terms "left" and "right" are redundant, .
Indeed we do - it's called populism. And once again, our history leaves us in no doubt about what happens when we listen to strong men who tell us what we (or some of us, at least) want to hear in order to subvert the rule of law for their own ends.and we have something else, something not fully formed yet, but the Brexit farce is bringing it all into focus
This isn't true either. Free speech is alive and well in the UK, as the anti-EU lobby showed yesterday when they plumbed new depths by posting a picture of the German Chancellor with the charming legend which went something like 'we didn't win two World Wars to be kicked around by a Kraut'. Makes one proud to be British. Not.In the UK nobody dares to address any issues alluding to "whites" being victims in any way shape or form, as that gets them labelled as racist. Genuine free speech on these issues, and others, has gone, and in that the UK is very different to the USA.
I'm not going to bother dealing with that part of your post I have not quoted, except to say it is all wrong.This isn't true either. Free speech is alive and well in the UK, as the anti-EU lobby showed yesterday when they plumbed new depths by posting a picture of the German Chancellor with the charming legend which went something like 'we didn't win two World Wars to be kicked around by a Kraut'. Makes one proud to be British. Not.
See this: Trans pronouns row doctor 'was not suspended'I'm not going to bother dealing with that part of your post I have not quoted, except to say it is all wrong.
As for free speech in the UK, perhaps you could explain this to the doctor who got sacked on the spot for daring to tell his manager that he would not address a notional six ft tall bearded man as "madam" if they "identified" as female. Christian doctor 'sacked' for refusing 'to call any 6ft bearded man madam'
In his case he cited his own religious beliefs in his defence, but actually that is irrelevant as I as a non believer have exactly the same view.
|Similar History Discussions||History Forum||Date|
|Why aren't Mongols condemned for having a statue of Genghis Khan?||Controversial History|
|Why aren't great commanders in WW I & II worthy of consideration for GOAT?||Military History|
|Why aren't "violent extremists" referred to as heretics instead of "radicals"?||Philosophy / Sociology|
|Other countries aren't completely useless.||General History|