- May 2016
Thanks for the article.A map of guimar-complex with 9 Pyramids on page 141
One thing we must agree, I think: “Nevertheless both factions should deliver more concrete evidence, being open for arguments of the other side!” p.148
And here I would underline two words: “concrete evidence”.
And: “A final appeal: Canarian authorities, politicians, universities and archaeologists should at long last opt for a meticulous scientific series of investigations – after over 20 years of stagnation – to stop the loss of monuments and to reduce fruitless discussions, wild speculations, non-scientific influences and a denial of the own valuable past.” p.152
And here I would underline: "...to reduce fruitless discussions, wild speculations, non-scientific influences..."
Here I didn’t understood you. What article you are referring? Can you elaborate on this part?The article doesnt write About how a ceremony of guanches look like at least a short Explanation one would expect if something "Quote ...are absolutely false".