Do you prefer the social or military aspects of history?

Jun 2015
493
The Former British Empire
#1
Title says it all- do you prefer the social or military aspects of history? I say social- but I appreciate a good battle!! And some of my favorite historical figures were great military tacticians, and are so for that reason...
 

Salah

Forum Staff
Oct 2009
23,284
Maryland
#3
Both, more or less equally actually. I find myself drifting closer to the social aspect as I get older, though.
 
Oct 2011
4,468
Gwendraeth Valley, Carmarthenshire, Wales.
#4
Loved battles only as a child but later mainly social history. However hope to read shortly a couple of books from the library on Waterloo which I visited in the 1990s.
 
Apr 2016
14
Europe
#5
A mix of both actually as I like to read of personal accounts from military battles, or how they affected the noble and common grunt alike. WW1 is a ''goldmine'' in that regard.
 
Jan 2015
5,563
Ontario, Canada
#8
All these perspectives of history are important and at times contribute to the other. That said I find social history to be extremely boring or at times irritating and hard as hell to understand why a certain person or movement did what it did. Military history is just awesome though and far more interesting and engaging in my opinion.
 
Aug 2012
1,554
#10
Social. War is a foolish endeavour - and the only good I can see from it is the art it inspires, from suits of armour to great tapestries, to stories and song.
But social history, folklore, mythology, religion, politics, I find that infinitely more intriguing.