- Mar 2013
Nope. That's not how it works. Give us your sources and then explain their relevance. If you cannot don't keep repeating yourself. You claim that the linguistic theories are wrong, but you provide bo evidence for this. Yes my knowledge of the Greek language is minimal. But i did not devise the PIE theories. The various scholars who have worked with the Greek and Latin linguistic evolution from PIE languages are experts in the languages in question. It id not me you are refuting, it is them, and if you seek to claim that they are lying or are ignorant or mistaken you need to provide evidence and references. Telling us to read hesiod is not evidence, its a meaningless statement. I might as well tell you to "read the Rg Veda" as proof of the theory. You need to explain yourself and your assertions. If you cant due to technological constraints then please provide the sources when you get them and until then please stop making baseless assertions. Lack of a computer is not a defense to an argument.In reading different ancient authors from Hesiod to Heraklit, Aristotele, Socrates , Platon , Ploutarch you get more than enough informations about.
I repeat it so much times that I write from a tablet so I let this on the air when I write something about.
just read orphic hymns as example and you get a taste of what I mean. Besides all this many of the things what I read about the ancient greek religion and cosmotheory are semi knowledge or just ignorance. I also have about not complete knowledge and ignore much things, as you can maybe see I was for a time absides till I start to write about.