In Search Of "Objective Observers"

In a recent conversation about history online, an interlocutor has insisted that his avant-garde stance on historical sources would convince "any objective observer." Call me cynical, but I think he may have made this claim because he felt confident that the conversation in question, though completely public, would go totally unnoticed, and that zero objective observers would actually have to be convinced. It turns out you can link to things on the internet regardless of whether or not they're still on the front page of their host website, though, so I've sought out a historical community of which I am not an extant member to verify his hypothesis.


Ad Honoris
Aug 2010
Welsh Marches
The discussion is rather hampered by the fact that one of the interlocutors doesn't seem to undertstand of the meaning of the term 'primary source'!

Similar History Discussions