Is India on 99 year lease ?

Aug 2019
48
India
Article 147 of INDIAN PENAL CODE says England can even today capture India. Article-147 mentions 5 items --- IIA-1947, GoIA-1935 and Privy Council, amendments in IIA-1947 and amendments in GoIA-1935 wrt interpretation of constitution.
Art-147 clearly says that supreme court judges will have to FOLLOW these five items.
We are still under The control of British parliament and British supreme Court.Article-147 of Constitution says that Supreme judges have to obey British Court.

PLEASE get simple ENGLISH and HINDI re-statement of article-147 of Indian constitution. Call every HC\SC Judges you know, and ask every professor you know. If professor says that "he cant understand this English" then threaten him that you will tell this truth to all that he cant understand art-147.
There is a reason why art-147 is written in clumsy English , which lawyers and judges are not even able too understand after reading it 10 times.

India is on lease for 99 years.

Solution :-we should remove article-147 and replace it with article-147 which says that "Supreme Court judges will interpret Constitution as per the will and wish of the majority of the citizens of India"

Jawaharlal Nehru and Rajendra Prasad wrote art-147 in such complex English. They didn't want people to know that art-147 gives power to Privy Council to rule over SCjs. And now if ONLY one clause is complex, and other clauses are simple, then it will stand out and get exposed. So they wrote each and every clause in most complex English possible.
=======
You might want to compare Indian Constitution with USA's Constitution. Even ordinary 10th student can understand US constitution in 2-3 readings. While Indian constitution was written by Rajendra Prasad and Jawaharlal Nehru in a way that even LLB, English medium cant understand.

This article-147 is an opportunity for British,US ( along vid NATO) forces to attack india . ( like they attacked iraq stating chemical/nuclear weapons the reason) . See,US and NATO are NOW trying to enslave Syria, then Iran and then India will be next because To attack on other countries and get Crude Oil
Mines free of cost.,URANIUM, GOLD, phosphates, salt, kaolinite and lime
stone that’s the rabbit chased by US and NATO countries.

High Levels Corruption in India is the Gift of Famous Freedom Fighter and First Prime Minister of India Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru. That is why I was never surprised when, I seen and experienced that Smt. Sonia Gandhi and Shri Rahul Gandhi are hiding the true facts about their permanent allegiance to the Constitution of Italy.

According to our belief the Parliament is the supreme legislative body in India . In our Constitution, it is declared that “WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA , having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a (SOVEREIGN … REPUBLIC)... AND TO GIVE OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION.†While, historical facts giving quite different picture that "we the People of India not adopted the Constitution of India", rather we were under legal obligation being imposed by Nehru Dynasty to adopt our constitution under the ordained made by Indian Independence Act, 1947, passed by British Parliament on 18th July, 1947.

Even after 67 years of Independence, still we Indians believe that Indian Constitution was prepared by Dr. B. R. Ambedkar. But, this was contradicted by Dr. Ambedkar himself, on 2nd September 1953, by making a statement in the Rajya Sabha (Parliament) that “People always keep on saying to me, so you are the maker of the Constitution. My answer is I was a hack. What I was asked to, I did much against my will. I am quite prepared to say that I shall be the first person to burn it. It does not suit anybody.â€

As per hidden agreement on 2nd September 1946, the Interim Government of India was formed, with Nehru as its head. The Constituent Assembly approved the aforesaid allegiance to British Rule in Article 147 of the Constitution of India to ensure that Supreme Court and High Courts in India cannot interpret anything beyond the scope of the interpretation of the Government of India Act, 1935.To hide the terms and conditions that were actually agreed upon between the Congress Leadership and the Cabinet Mission, on July 10.This Agreement, which was actually agreed upon, stands exposed by Section 8 of the Indian Independence Act, 1947, passed on 18th July 1947, by the British Parliament, imposing the allegiance to British Rule governed in India under Government of India Act, 1935.
 
Jul 2016
1,349
Dengie Peninsula
Any country East of Dover is in such a state that the last thing a British Government would want to do is take over the problems of India. So, stay calm and carry on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Futurist

Chlodio

Forum Staff
Aug 2016
4,745
Dispargum
The US Constitution says (Art. 6, Section 1): "All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation." meaning that certain obligations did not disappear just because there was a new constitution. Is this what India's Article 147 means? Laws or other obligations entered into under the 1935 Government of India Act are still valid? If so, that's just a convenient phrase so that all of the old laws did not have to be re-legislated and all existing contracts were still valid.
 

Kevinmeath

Ad Honoris
May 2011
14,076
Navan, Ireland
Where in what has been posted does it mention a 99 year lease?

Even if it was there and was true how would the British enforce such a clause?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Futurist

Devdas

Ad Honorem
Apr 2015
5,017
India
India is a republic now, which means British enjoys no political links to India unlike dominions of Canada or Australia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Futurist

Futurist

Ad Honoris
May 2014
22,750
SoCal
India is a republic now, which means British enjoys no political links to India unlike dominions of Canada or Australia.
I thought that being a dominion was mostly symbolic nowadays. I mean, Yes, they do have the British monarch, but if the British monarch nowadays is a figurehead, what else is left?

Any country East of Dover is in such a state that the last thing a British Government would want to do is take over the problems of India. So, stay calm and carry on.
Yeah, Britain is busy enough with Brexit as it is to worry about India.
 

Devdas

Ad Honorem
Apr 2015
5,017
India
I thought that being a dominion was mostly symbolic nowadays. I mean, Yes, they do have the British monarch, but if the British monarch nowadays is a figurehead, what else is left?


Yeah, Britain is busy enough with Brexit as it is to worry about India.
Queen is the head of state in Australia and New Zealand, in India its a President, even there is no symbolic link except a commonwealth membership.

Yes, Britain seems to have badly entangled into Brexit, nobody has a solution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tulius and Futurist

MG1962a

Ad Honorem
Mar 2019
2,195
Kansas
I thought that being a dominion was mostly symbolic nowadays. I mean, Yes, they do have the British monarch, but if the British monarch nowadays is a figurehead, what else is left?
India went with a Republican model backed up with a Westminster system of government. So the President effectively took the place of the Queen. It took a little legal shenanigans to accommodate, but they got it sorted out. Given the history leading up to that point, the British owed them the favor.