Moth Eaten Pakistan : How Pakistan was robbed from its Ancient Rightful Land and people.

Status
Closed
Oct 2018
24
Panjab
#1
Pakistan claims its Origin from the Indus Valley Civilization that bonded people of the Indus valley who in turn colonized areas that are in neighborhood of Indus valley.

Indus valley is Located in the Pakistan and Regions of the Indian Punjab, Western Rajasthan called Maru-pradesh and and Western Gujarat called Kathiawar that was culturally and linguistically a Sindhi Speaking Region before Gujarati came from the Rajputana and their dialect died out in some 11th century.

This is the IVC :


here ,

the latter of Declaration of Pakistan,

The declaration was circulated with a covering letter dated 28 January 1933 signed by Rahmat Ali alone, and addressed from 3 Humberstone Road. It read as follows:[9]
3, Humberstone Road,
Cambridge, England.
28 January 1933​


Dear Sir or Madam,

I am enclosing herewith an appeal on behalf of the thirty million Muslims of PAKISTAN, who live in the five Northern Units of India—Punjab, North-West Frontier (Afghan) Province, Gujarat, Kashmir, Sind, and Baluchistan. It embodies their demand for the recognition of their national status, as distinct from the other inhabitants of India, by the grant to Pakistan of a separate Federal Constitution on religious, social and historical grounds.


I shall be pleased if you will kindly acquaint me with your valuable opinion on the proposed solution of the great Hindu-Muslim problem. I trust that, vitally interested as you are in a just and permanent solution of that complex problem, the objects outlined in the appeal wiIl meet with your fullest approval and active support.​


Yours truly, Rahmat Ali (Choudhary).​
(Founder, Pakistan National Movement)
Source : Pakistan Declaration - Wikipedia

in the end the rightful land and people of Pakistan were divided by the Indians and Pakistan/Indus valley lost 1/3 of its land of Eastern Punjab, Maru-Pradesh and Western Gujarat. and in exchange we got Bangla-stan, a land different to the Indus valley in everyway possible with 1200 distance.

Jinnah Displayed his anger at this by calling the new boarder a moth eaten one.

MOVE TO PARTITION PUNJAB AND BENGAL
Text of Mr. Jinnah’s Statement
I and B. Department,
New Delhi, 4th May, 1947
Following is the text of Mr. Jinnah’s statement opposing partition of the Punjab and Bengal:-
” I find from press reports that Congress has now started by emphasising that in the event of Pakistan and Hindustan being established, the Punjab will be partitioned, and the Hindu Mahasabha has started vigorous propaganda that Bengal should be partitioned.
” I should like to point out that there is a great deal of confusion created on purpose. The question of a division of India, as proposed by the Muslim League, is based on the fundamental fact that there are two nations- Hindus and Muslims- and the underlying principle is that we want a national home and a national state in our homelands which are predominately Muslim and compromise the six units of the Punjab, the N.W.F.P., Sind, Baluchistan, Bengal and Assam. This will give the Hindus their national home and a national state of Hindustan, which means three-fourths of British India.
” Now the question of partitioning Bengal and the Punjab is raised, not with a ‘bona fide’ object, as a sinister move actuated by spite and bitterness, as they feel that India is going to be divided, firstly to create more difficulties in the way for the British Government and the Viceroy and secondly to unnerve the Muslims by opening and repeatedly emphasising that the Muslims will get a truncated or mutilated moth-eaten Pakistan. This clamour is not based on any sound principle, except that the Hindu minorities in the Punjab and Bengal wish to cut up these provinces and cut up their own people into two in these Provinces. The Hindus have their homelands, as I have said, consisting of six vast Provinces. Merely because a proportion of the minorities in the Pakistan Provinces have taken up this attitude with the British Government should not countenance it, because the result of that will be logically that all other Provinces will have to be cut up in similar way, which will be dangerous, as to embark on this line will lead to a breaking up of various Provinces and create a far more dangerous situation in the future than at present. If such a process were to be adopted it will strike at the root of the administrative, economic and political life of the Provinces which have for nearly a century developed and built up on that basis and have grown as functioning under present constitution as autonomous provinces.
It is obvious that if the Hindu minorities in Pakistan wish to emigrate and go to their homelands of Hindustan they will be at liberty to do so and ‘vice versa’ and those Muslims who wish to emigrate from Hindustan can do so and go to Pakistan; and sooner or later an exchange of population will have to take place and Constituent Assemblies of Pakistan and Hindustan can take up the matter and subsequently the respective Governments in Pakistan and Hindustan can effectively carry out an exchange of population wherever it may be necessary and feasible.

“Complete Division of India”
Dr. Rajendra Prasad, President of the Constitituent Assembly, in press interview on April 30th, declared that if there was to be a division of India, and Mr. Jinnah insisted on it, it should be as complete and thorough as possible, including the division of the Punjab and Bengal, so that there might not be left any room for contention or conflict. “If that requires division of defence forces, that should also be brought about, and the sooner the better”. Neither Congress nor the Hindus or Sikhs, said Dr, Rajendra Prasad, ever wanted the division of India. It was the Muslim League and Mr. Jinnah who had been insisting on it.
Recalling the Muslim League’s Lahore resolution on the division of India, which demanded the demarcation of contiguous units with the necessary territorial adjustments and the creation of independent states out of zones where Muslims were numerically in the majority, Dr. Rajendra Prasad says the division of the Punjab and Bengal was in terms of that resolution. According to that resolution, the League cannot demand any areas to be included into Muslim zones which are not contiguous and in which Muslims are not numerically in a majority. “If areas of the Punjab and Bengal where Muslims are not in a majority demand fulfilment of the League’s resolution, how does it lie in the mouth of Mr. Jinnah to accuse them and abuse them. He cannot have it both ways.” If division was insisted on, it could only be on a basis which suited both parties and not him alone.
Referring to Mr. Jinnah’s remark that partition of the Punjab and Bengal would disrupt the life of the Provinces, Dr Rajendra Peasad said: “He forgets he is responsible for disrupting these and many more valuable ties which have been forged in the course of centuries, by seeking to divide India.”
source : Jinnah on partition - The National Archives

interestingly all the Founders of the Pakistan were from Indus valley.

CRA was a Punjabi
Allama Iqbal was a Kashmiri
the great Jinnah was a Western Gujarati/Kathiyawari
Liaqat ali was an eastern punjabi


this is the real Boarder of Pakistan,

see the bright red spots in the map, those are the region that were part of original Pakistan plan by CRA, the land and people that were stolen from the indus Valley by brainwashing and radicalization.

Carte_Indus.jpg


the green marks boarder of Pakistan with Eastern Punjab, Maru-Pradesh and Kathiyawar as part of Indua valley. as the founder dreamed.

Pakistan = Indus valley Civilization.
 

Tulius

Ad Honorem
May 2016
4,715
Portugal
#2
History of Pakistan is not my strong point, but didn’t Pakistan born in 1947, due to a religious separation from the rest of the territories that were a part of the British Raj?

All history before that is the history of the territory, not the history of the country.
 
Likes: Auditch
Oct 2018
24
Panjab
#3
Today Eastern Punjab and Gujarat are getting systematically colonized by the people from Ganga valley as population of Indus people is smaller compared to the Ganga valley.



Eastern Punjab (2%) and Gujarat (5%) of India yet they dominate Military and Economy of whole India, with high prosperity, its neutral for Poor Ganga folks to migrate tot these lands and leech it off. its a systametic genocide of identity of these people by making them minority in their own lands.
 
Oct 2018
24
Panjab
#4
History of Pakistan is not my strong point, but didn’t Pakistan born in 1947, due to a religious separation from the rest of the territories that were a part of the British Raj?

All history before that is the history of the territory, not the history of the country.
India is as much as country as Europe is.

This is you British Colony.


do u see any kind of similarity here ?

because its just a colony, imagine Indian taking over Europe and merging Germanic and Romance alongside bit of Slavic Groups and naming it :republic of Europe:

Indus valley on other hand is a Smaller Civilization, part of old 4 civilization group.
 

Tulius

Ad Honorem
May 2016
4,715
Portugal
#5
I am not sure that I understood your point, if by India in your post you mean the Republic of India, then yes, it is a country, recognized as such since 1947.

If by India you mean the all subcontinent, then no it is not a country, like Europe isn’t. Even if several countries in Europe have been trying in to build a unified country under the EU umbrella.
 
Status
Closed

Similar History Discussions