Preventing Communism in Europe

Sep 2019
182
Slovenia
To understand the communist strategy i advice mr. Yuri Bezmenov former KGB agent. He explains in the video what kind of people they were searching for their agents and also how KGB strategy was to change leaders/governaments of countries all over the world with more and more proSoviet. With real examples mostly from Asia. But it is obvious that the same was true also for latin America of course. He says also in 1984 that extensive demoralization of USA was done during last 25 years.




About real Soviet infiltration of FDR and Truman administrations:

 
Last edited:
Oct 2019
95
West Virginia
To understand the communist strategy i advice mr. Yuri Bezmenov former KGB agent. He explains in the video what kind of people they were searching for their agents and also how KGB strategy was to change leaders/governaments of countries all over the world with more and more proSoviet. With real examples mostly from Asia. But it is obvious that the same was true also for latin America of course. He says also in 1984 that extensive demoralization of USA was done during last 25 years.




About real Soviet infiltration of FDR and Truman administrations:

The few examples cited are nothing like what McCarthy claimed.

More dangerous to the world really were the manipulations of the UK, France and USA toward colonial nations, most of which they continue to control by the very means you ascribe to the Soviets.
 
Oct 2019
34
Budapest
Late Medieval Europe was hardly the paradise you suggest. Misery was rampant, peasants were virtual slaves still, and the church still rigidly controlled intellectual life. The standard of living was higher in Moorish Spain.

India at the time was Mughal occupied, and China ravaged by Mongols.

In many respects the standard of living in Mexico was higher than that of 13th-century Europe.
Wrong in all aspects.Misery is relative... Misery in a comparison with what? There were no Slaves in late medieval Eurpe, however in All Asian and African countries being Slave was accepted legal term. NExt time learn about the rights of the peasants in WEstern Christian medieval countries. Church controlled intellectual life in most non-europeann countries too. Standard of living were low in Muslim countries. It is enough to compare the hovel-like primitive structured homes of Arabs Chinese people and the homes of Western European city dwellers, and compare their means of production and applied technology. Late medieval Europe was already the most developed part of the planet.
 
Oct 2019
95
West Virginia
Wrong in all aspects.Misery is relative... Misery in a comparison with what? There were no Slaves in late medieval Eurpe, however in All Asian and African countries being Slave was accepted legal term. NExt time learn about the rights of the peasants in WEstern Christian medieval countries. Church controlled intellectual life in most non-europeann countries too. Standard of living were low in Muslim countries. It is enough to compare the hovel-like primitive structured homes of Arabs Chinese people and the homes of Western European city dwellers, and compare their means of production and applied technology. Late medieval Europe was already the most developed part of the planet.
You speak of urban dwellers, but most Europeans were rural, serfs or nearly so, and lived in, yes, hovels!

Some historians assert that the majority of the French population were slaves until 1789.

You ignore Mexico. Mexican cities were marvels of urban planning. Their food production systems were the best in the world. Their standard of living was higher than that for the average late Medieval European, that is certain.

In late Medieval times, Angkor was flourishing. Its living conditions were far superior than those of the average European.

Prosperity and development is not something the Europeans brought to the world. It existed in many places, and usually was destroyed by some invader... after 1492, that invader was usually European.
 
Oct 2019
34
Budapest
You speak of urban dwellers, but most Europeans were rural, serfs or nearly so, and lived in, yes, hovels!

Some historians assert that the majority of the French population were slaves until 1789.

You ignore Mexico. Mexican cities were marvels of urban planning. Their food production systems were the best in the world. Their standard of living was higher than that for the average late Medieval European, that is certain.

In late Medieval times, Angkor was flourishing. Its living conditions were far superior than those of the average European.

Prosperity and development is not something the Europeans brought to the world. It existed in many places, and usually was destroyed by some invader... after 1492, that invader was usually European.

Nonono. See some pictures and remains of medieval peasant Houses. That houses are the true ancestors of modern family houses, however the hovels of Asian African Arab peasant houses were literally no design continuity in modern era house-building ... because they were true hovels.
Mexico had primitive living standards in a comparison with Western European cities.

Just see some average medieval German houses:


medieval French houses:


Or read about these types of peasant houses: Hall house - Wikipedia
 
Last edited:
Sep 2019
182
Slovenia
@Barros Serrano The Soviet NKVD files are confirming how high in FDR administration Soviet spies really were and also how they were involved in making USA policy toward China where more people were killed by communists than by Hitler in Europe. This is known now for quite some time. Senator MacCharthy was working mostly against communist spies or their symapthizers in USA governament. The danger was very real.

Mr. Bezmenov is explaining very well how KGB changed mostly with force leaders of countries around the world like in Afganistan, Bangladesh etc. with more and more proSoviet ones until communist rule. It is obvious that the same is true for Latin America Guatemala or Chile. Stopping such events and communist takeovers is no 'neo-colonialism'.
 
Oct 2019
95
West Virginia
Nonono. See some pictures and remains of medieval peasant Houses. That houses are the true ancestors of modern family houses, however the hovels of Asian African Arab peasant houses were literally no design continuity in modern era house-building ... because they were true hovels.
Mexico had primitive living standards in a comparison with Western European cities.

Just see some average medieval German houses:


medieval French houses:


Or read about these types of peasant houses: Hall house - Wikipedia
Sorry but this misinformation cannot stand.

The rest of the world lived in hovels? Must I point out the racist core of that argument?

Are you aware of what housing was like in Nigeria, Mexico, China, India, Cambodia, etc.?

You want to compare the city house of a wealthy German with the tent of a Bedouin and claim Europe had superior housing to the rest of the world?

In 1522, the city of Tenochtitlán was of far superior design and function to any contemporary European city.
 
Oct 2019
34
Budapest
Sorry but this misinformation cannot stand.

The rest of the world lived in hovels? Must I point out the racist core of that argument?

Are you aware of what housing was like in Nigeria, Mexico, China, India, Cambodia, etc.?

You want to compare the city house of a wealthy German with the tent of a Bedouin and claim Europe had superior housing to the rest of the world?

In 1522, the city of Tenochtitlán was of far superior design and function to any contemporary European city.
When you lose a debate, you start to claim racism automatically? It doesn't sound as a rational reasoning...
 
Last edited:
Oct 2019
95
West Virginia
If you lose a deabte you start to claim racism automatically? It doesn'd sound rational reasoning...
I lost no debate. You asserted that everywhere but Europe the housing was hovels. That isn't racism?

"You call racism when you lose an argument"--- THAT argument comes from such as Rush Limbaugh, an obvious overt and virulent RACIST!

You are plainly ignorant of the housing in the rest of the world in that time, so why not research it before posting any more Eurocentric nonsense?

Tell me about the housing of the common people in Tenochtitlán or Texcoco. Or in Angkor. Or in Ife.

And what is "wattle and daub", the materials used for most peasant housing in Medieval England? In modern English: "sticks and mud".

It is interesting in Peru to compare the magnificently constructed Inca architecture with the churches the Spanish built after the conquest. The latter by comparison look like they were built by kindergarten children.
 
Oct 2019
34
Budapest
I lost no debate. You asserted that everywhere but Europe the housing was hovels. That isn't racism?

"You call racism when you lose an argument"--- THAT argument comes from such as Rush Limbaugh, an obvious overt and virulent RACIST!

You are plainly ignorant of the housing in the rest of the world in that time, so why not research it before posting any more Eurocentric nonsense?

Tell me about the housing of the common people in Tenochtitlán or Texcoco. Or in Angkor. Or in Ife.

And what is "wattle and daub", the materials used for most peasant housing in Medieval England? In modern English: "sticks and mud".

It is interesting in Peru to compare the magnificently constructed Inca architecture with the churches the Spanish built after the conquest. The latter by comparison look like they were built by kindergarten children.
Is it racism to speak about differences in science technology economy (HOUSING) industry education etc...? No, it is not.
"Rush Limbaugh" nobody knows who is that person, maybe you are subsrcribed to his channel?

" more Eurocentric nonsense?"

Your housing fantasy sound so rational like the frustrated story (fake history) about the black Shakespeare or black Beethoven...