There is a fair amount of controversy regarding the Megalithic System of Measures. There doesn’t need to be any controversy, but it exists.

Proponents of the Megalithic System of Measures (MSOM) argue that the 2.727272 Megalithic Yard value, through extrapolation, indicates that the Ancients knew, and had, knowledge of the Earth’s circumference. Not only did they have knowledge, but the physical measure of 2.727272 reflects a down-scaling of that knowledge. The implicit part of the argument is that the Ancients had physically measured, or surveyed, on the EARTH the dimensioning. The explicit part of the argument is that the 7920 ESM diameter of the Earth was the PHYSICAL measure/survey of the Earth.

Opponents of the MSOM then ask the simple question of how the Ancients physically surveyed the entirety of the Earth’s surface. There is no rational way to answer this question so, subsequently, the scholars pronounce that the MSOM is nothing more than pseudo-scientific metrology.

Both the Proponents and the Opponents are yelling at each other from opposite sides of the room. Here’s the real deal:

-The Ancients didn’t physically measure/survey the terrestrial Earth. It didn’t happen.

-The English Statute Mile is not an Ancient Measure.

-The 7920 English Statute Mile diameter of the Earth is not an Ancient Measure.

-The 7920-integer value is Ancient.

-The MSOM is a time-based system whose resultant values were then converted into dimensional units.

-Time came first; the use of the sexagesimal value system set up the 24 hour, 60 minute, 60 second framework.

-The 24h, 60m, 60s framework was translated into the 360°, 60’, 60” values.

-The 360°, 60’, 60” values was then expanded into smaller units of arc-minutes and arc-seconds. Effectively, this is a hybrid value-unit integrating dimension (movement) and time.

-This produced the CONCEPTUAL unit of Earth CIRCUMFERENCE-MEASURE understood as 21,600 arc-minutes, conversely 21,600 nautical miles.

----

We are on the ground floor of the Megalithic System. Pressing the elevator button just moves us to another floor. I tend to remain focused on Floor 22 because of the “consonance” to the MY value: - 22 System (7920 particula); 90° - 21,600 nm/7920 PARTICULA = 2.727272 nm per PARTICULA.

However, there are other floors below the 22nd level:

-11 System (3960 particula); 180° - 21,600 nm/3960 ‘particula’ = 5.454545 nm per ‘particula’

-5.5 System (1980 particula); 360° - 21,600 nm/1980 ‘particula’ = 10.9090909 nm per ‘particula’

Additionally, there are other floors above the 22nd level:

-33 System (11,880 particula); 45° - 21,600 nm/11,880 ‘particula’ = 1.818181 nm per ‘particula’

-44 System (15,840 particula); 0° - 21,600 nm/15,840 ‘particula’ = 1.363636 nm per ‘particula’

In an emergency, we can hit the STOP button while riding the elevator and find our CUBIT value: If 90°/X° = 2.727272/1.727272; X = 56.99999° (57°, which then drops us in our 90° - 57° - 33° value set)

Then we can find out how many ‘particula’ comprise a mathematical CUBIT: 21,600 nm/X ‘particula’ = 1.727272 nm per ‘particula’; X = 12505.268423 ‘particula’ - 12505.268423 ‘particula’ slots us at 57°

You see, all one has to do is ride the MATHEMATICAL ELEVATOR. It is SCALING.

----

The scholars in Ancient India knew about the elevator, albeit in a different form. As best I can discern in the very limited reading I have done on their astronomical corpus, they didn’t use the 7920 or 22 values. They used axial tilt – because they wrote of it in their astronomical treatise, SŪRYA SIDDHĀNTA, in a section which a scholar has dated to have originated back in 7300-7800 BC. You can read of it here:

“SŪRYA SIDDHĀNTA”

Indian/Hindu Astronomical Treatise

24° Axial Tilt

https://www.facebook.com/114338978642314/photos/a.114955778580634/1766012746808254/?type=3&theater

INDIA TO ICELAND

The Megalithic Value System

https://www.facebook.com/114338978642314/photos/a.114955778580634/1786818958060966/?type=3&theater

Here is what we wrote previously about the tie-in to the MSOM:

“During this 360° year, the obliquity of the ecliptic, relative to the ZODIAC, is observed to have moved 24° from an Equinox Point to a Solstice Point (48° total throw). During this 360° year, the obliquity of the ecliptic, relative to the SUN’S rising point on the horizon, from an Equinox Point to a Solstice Point, is observed to have moved 24° (48° total throw).

360° (year)/66° (Arctic to Equator) = 5.454545 (Megalithic Fathom)

360° (year)/132° (Arctic to Antarctic Circle span in a year) = 2.727272 (Megalithic Yard)

Welcome to MSOM.

----

No one in the Megalithic Era – or even before according to the SŪRYA SIDDHĀNTA – was stretching a chain with links across the terrestrial Earth to measure/survey its circumference. They didn’t need to – observing and TIMING the celestial sphere (the heavens) worked just fine.

Therefore, PROPONENTS need to stop stating, or implying, that the Ancients “knew” the physical dimension of the Earth’s circumference. What they knew was an external reference could inform them of the TIME-DIMENSION of the Earth’s circumference. They then applied this conceptually, through mathematical scaling, into a circumference dimension. They then down-scaled that circumference measure into smaller dimensional units. Furthermore, quit running around saying that the 7920 ESM circumferential measure of the Earth is Ancient, as it isn’t. Only the 7920 integer is Ancient, the unit label explicitly connected to 5280’ ES is a 14th century retrofit.

PROPONENTS need to construct MODELS. This is what science does…they take data and MODEL it.

PROPONENTS need to quit connecting every known historical measure into the Megalithic System of Measures. Two-hundred pages of long units, short units, fractional long and short units is too much. Until one can make an accurate discrimination between units that are valid and others that are corruptions, presenting two thousand historical measures is worthless. The fact that the majority of those two thousand measures are long/short and fractional adjustments actually diminishes the impact of what is being told. All that long/short and fractional measure stuff is bullshit anyways…all that is being done is that units are being mathematically whipsawed in a gross case of pre-confirmation bias.

PROPONENTS need to quite using square roots. Until it can be shown that this mathematical operation was used eight thousand years ago, stay away from it. If you haven’t noticed the only mathematical functions that I have used is multiplication and division…setting up proportions and ratios.

OPPONENTS need to sharpen their wits, as well. The pseudo-metrology label is a cop-out. The easiest answer one can give is “No.” That is what pseudo-metrology label explicitly presents. It’s a lazy way of trying to impress others with your pseudo-intellect. Whatever money that pseudo-metrology advocates spent on their education was a waste.

================================