The Mohenjo Daro ‘Massacre'?

Mar 2018
18
Pakistan
#1
The Mohenjo Daro ‘Massacre'?
https://www.facebook.com/AncientPak...1829.780770378649615/1832424113484231/?type=3





In the 1920s, the discovery of ancient cities at Mohenjo Daro and Harappa in Pakistan gave the first clue to the existence more than 4,000 years ago of a civilization in the Indus Valley to rival those known in Egypt and Mesopotamia.


These cities demonstrated an exceptional level of civic planning and amenities. The houses were furnished with brick-built bathrooms and many had toilets. Wastewater from these was led into well-built brick sewers that ran along the centre of the streets, covered with bricks or stone slabs. Cisterns and wells finely constructed of wedge-shaped bricks held public supplies of drinking water. Mohenjo Daro also boasted a Great Bath on the high mound (citadel) overlooking the residential area of the city. Built of layers of carefully fitted bricks, gypsum mortar and waterproof bitumen, this basin is generally thought to have been used for ritual purification.
However, in contrast to the well-appointed houses and clean streets, the uppermost levels at Mohenjo Daro contained squalid makeshift dwellings, a careless intermingling of residential and industrial activity and, most significantly, a series of more than 40 sprawled skeletons lying scattered in streets and houses. Paul Bahn (2002) describes the scene:


"In a room with a public well in one area of the city were found the skeletons of two individuals who appeared desperately to have been using their last scraps of energy to crawl up the stair leading from the room to the street; the tumbled remains of two others lay nearby. Elsewhere in the area the ‘strangely contorted’ and incomplete remains of nine individuals were found, possibly thrown into a rough pit. In a lane between two houses in another area, another six skeletons were loosely covered with earth."


Numerous other skeletons were found within layers of rubble, ash and debris, or lying in streets in contorted positions that suggested the agonies of violent death.


The remains of these individuals led many archaeologists at the time to conclude that these people all died by violence. Sir Mortimer Wheeler, who excavated at Mohenjo Daro in 1950s, believed they were victims of a single massacre and suggested that the Indus civilization, whose demise was unexplained, had fallen to an armed invasion by Indo-Aryans, nomadic newcomers from the northwest, who are thought to have settled in the Indus Valley during the second millennium BC. Wheeler claimed the remains belonged to individuals who were defending the city in its final hours. He was so convincing that this theory became the accepted version of the fate of the Indus civilization.


However, many of his claims simply did not add up. There was no evidence that the skeletons belonged to ‘defenders of the city’ as no weapons were found and the skeletons contained no evidence of violent injuries. Some archaeologists suggested that the influx of Indo-Aryan people occurred after the decline of the Indus civilization.


An alternative theory was put forward that the city suffered extensive flooding and that people died off as a result of water-borne diseases such as cholera. Recent investigations revealed considerable evidence of flooding at Mohenjo Daro in the form of many layers of silty clay. The Indus River was prone to change its course and through the centuries moved gradually eastward, leading periodically to flooding within the bounds of the city. Indeed, the massive brick platforms on which the city is constructed and the fortifications around parts of it seemed to have been designed to provide protection against such floods. Conditions would have been ideal for the spread of water-borne diseases, especially cholera, although cholera epidemics cannot be proved to have occurred.


The conclusion that many mainstream archaeologists now make is that the ‘massacre’ victims from Mohenjo Daro were simply the victims of the natural tragedy of fatal disease rather than that of human aggression. But this conclusion also has many holes – why did the remains of individuals appear in contorted positions, almost frozen at the very moment of death? Why did they appear to have been struck down suddenly? Surely if they died of disease their bodies would have been buried and not found scattered around the streets.


There exist a growing number of ‘alternative archaeologists’ and researchers who have not settled for theories that do not satisfactorily explain the conditions of the skeletal remains and who have sought other explanations. One such individual is David Davenport, British researcher, who spent 12 years studying ancient scripts and evidence at the site where the great city once stood. In his book Atomic Destruction in 2000 B.C. he reveals some startling findings: the objects found at the site appeared to be fused, glassified by a heat as high as 1500°C, followed by a sudden cooling. Within the city itself there appeared to be an ‘epicentre’ about 50 yards wide within which everything was crystallized, fused or melted, and sixty yards from the center the bricks are melted on one side indicating a blast. A. Gorbovsky in his book Riddles of Ancient History, reported the discovery of at least one human skeleton in the area with a level of radioactivity approximately 50 times greater than it should have been due to natural radiation. Davenport claimed that what was found at Mohenjo Daro corresponded exactly to what was seen at Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
Davenport's theory was met with intense interest from the scientific community. Nationally known expert William Sturm said: “the melting of bricks at Mohenjo Daro could not have been caused by a normal fire”, while Professor Antonio Castellani, a space engineer in Rome said: “it's possible that what happened at Mohenjo Daro was not a natural phenomenon”.
Since there is no indication of a volcanic eruption at Mohenjo-Daro, one answer that has been put forward is that the ancient city might have been irradiated by an atomic blast. If true, it would be impossible to ignore the conclusion that ancient civilization possessed high technology.
If Mohanjo Daro was destroyed by a nuclear catastrophe, who created the weapons and how? If not, then what was it that produced enough heat to vitrify rock and bricks? What could explain the high degree of radioactive traces in the skeletons? How did all of them die, in one instant? We believe it is time to stop accepting the sanitized view of the world provided to us by mainstream science and to begin digging a little deeper.


References
Bahn, P. (2002). Written in Bones: How Human Remains Unlock the Secrets of the Dead. London: New Burlington Books.
Davenport, D. (1979). Atomic Destruction in 2000 B.C. Milan, Italy
Gorbovsky, A. (1966). Riddles of Ancient History. Moscow: Soviet Publishers.
 
Sep 2012
1,615
London, centre of my world
#2
If there had been a devastating explosion, wouldn't the skeletons would show signs of impact trauma? Also, surely they would have found lots of bits of skeletons all over the site (glowing in the dark if it was a nuclear blast :cool:).

Found amongst ash, rubble and debris? I'm betting many the contortions resemble the 'pugilist' stance, caused as a result of bodies being exposed to a fatally extreme heat.
No weapons found? Maybe these victims weren't armed at all.
Perhaps they were herded into a covered place and burned alive.

I'm going with Wheeler's theory, though I'm not sure if the culprits were Indo-Europeans or not.
 

specul8

Ad Honorem
Oct 2016
3,171
Australia
#3
There exist a growing number of ‘alternative archaeologists’ and researchers who have not settled for theories that do not satisfactorily explain the conditions of the skeletal remains and who have sought other explanations.
Well, thats one way of putting it, I suppose .

here is another ; there exists, for some reason, a growing band of internuts, who believe in all sorts of unscientific, imaginary and delusional ideas (like ancient civilizations with super technologies ) and continually look for 'evidence' by distorting finds and listing to 'experts ' ( from other fields ) to try and sure up their belief systems .

One such individual is David Davenport, British researcher, who spent 12 years studying ancient scripts and evidence at the site where the great city once stood. In his book Atomic Destruction in 2000 B.C.
A 'researcher' eh ? I to am a 'researcher' :)


he reveals some startling findings: the objects found at the site appeared to be fused, glassified by a heat as high as 1500°C, followed by a sudden cooling. Within the city itself there appeared to be an ‘epicentre’ about 50 yards wide within which everything was crystallized, fused or melted, and sixty yards from the center the bricks are melted on one side indicating a blast.


A. Gorbovsky in his book Riddles of Ancient History, reported the discovery of at least one human skeleton in the area with a level of radioactivity approximately 50 times greater than it should have been due to natural radiation. Davenport claimed that what was found at Mohenjo Daro corresponded exactly to what was seen at Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
Exactly ? !

Davenport's theory was met with intense interest from the scientific community.
'Interest' ?


Nationally known expert William Sturm said: “the melting of bricks at Mohenjo Daro could not have been caused by a normal fire”, while Professor Antonio Castellani, a space engineer in Rome said: “it's possible that what happened at Mohenjo Daro was not a natural phenomenon”.
An expert eh ? .... A ... (wait for it ) ... " Space engineer " ? ? ?

(now there are some credentials ! ) :D

Since there is no indication of a volcanic eruption at Mohenjo-Daro, one answer that has been put forward is that the ancient city might have been irradiated by an atomic blast. If true, it would be impossible to ignore the conclusion that ancient civilization possessed high technology.
If Mohanjo Daro was destroyed by a nuclear catastrophe, who created the weapons and how? If not, then what was it that produced enough heat to vitrify rock and bricks? What could explain the high degree of radioactive traces in the skeletons? How did all of them die, in one instant? We believe it is time to stop accepting the sanitized view of the world provided to us by mainstream science and to begin digging a little deeper.
I think that digging a little deeper into this will expose its falsity !


References
Bahn, P. (2002). Written in Bones: How Human Remains Unlock the Secrets of the Dead. London: New Burlington Books.
Davenport, D. (1979). Atomic Destruction in 2000 B.C. Milan, Italy
Gorbovsky, A. (1966). Riddles of Ancient History. Moscow: Soviet Publishers.[/QUOTE]


Its not even worth a detailed de-bunk ..... I will let Jason do that ;

http://www.jasoncolavito.com/uploads/3/7/5/9/3759274/colavito_-_ancient_atom_bombs.pdf
 

Aupmanyav

Ad Honorem
Jun 2014
5,479
New Delhi, India
#5
First speculation: I strongly believe that the name 'Mohenjodaro' arises from 'Moyan jo dero', which in Punjabi/Saraiki/Sindhi would mean 'the camp of the dead'. So, even before the excavations, the legend said so.

Second speculation: Why only 40 or so skeletons? The city was huge and at its peak population is thought to have been around 40,000 (Oxford Handbook of Cities in World History). So the event happened much later than the decline/abandonment of the city. Stragglers, who took refuge in the abandoned city.

Third speculation: Floods? Probably not. The people could have taken refuge in the higher grounds - the Granary. So, I think diseases. Plague or Cholera.

 

Devdas

Ad Honorem
Apr 2015
4,486
India
#6
The skeletons belongs to different period of the history buried at same place as proved by Radio carbon dating. Mojenjodaro massacre is nothing more than a hoax.
 

tomar

Ad Honoris
Jan 2011
13,314
#8
Since there is no indication of a volcanic eruption at Mohenjo-Daro, one answer that has been put forward is that the ancient city might have been irradiated by an atomic blast. If true, it would be impossible to ignore the conclusion that ancient civilization possessed high technology.
If Mohanjo Daro was destroyed by a nuclear catastrophe, who created the weapons and how?


Obviously someone who had money to waste, using a nuke to kill a few dozen people in a primitive city.....
 
Jun 2012
7,256
Malaysia
#9
Funny, that ancient high tech civilisation never left any nuke-related smoking guns. At least to taunt us into contemplating how backward we in our age must be, if nothing else.:cool:

Hmm. How about an intense heat wave from Sahara desert, followed in short order by an equally intense cold wave from Siberia.
 

tomar

Ad Honoris
Jan 2011
13,314
#10
Since there is no indication of a volcanic eruption at Mohenjo-Daro, one answer that has been put forward is that the ancient city might have been irradiated by an atomic blast. If true, it would be impossible to ignore the conclusion that ancient civilization possessed high technology.
If Mohanjo Daro was destroyed by a nuclear catastrophe, who created the weapons and how?


Here is the debunking below (see starting 16:00)

In addition I'd say the logic

"found squelettons ==> cannot explain their death ==> must be nukes" is highly questionnable to say the least....
one could go one step further and say "==> philadelphia experiment by the US army ==> nukes transported back in time to be tested stealthily"








 
Last edited:

Similar History Discussions