Was Congress as liberal and secular during and before partition? Congress's role in Barbri mosque demolition

Status
Closed
Apr 2018
77
Ayodhya
you can do that but it will be no different than nazis

regards
How so? The Nazis killed innocent Jews. We are just targeting the structure that the Nazis of the era (Aurangzeb and co.) built after destroying our temple. We are just correcting a historical wrong. The real Nazis are Aurangzeb and his supporters (plenty of them among Indian Muslims, no surprise there).
 
Nov 2014
500
India
Supreme Court does not make political decisions. It was based on the evidence put before them by all parties to the dispute, especially the ASI report and there being no evidence of use of the mosque before 1850. It was a mosque which was not used (perhaps because of Hindu sensibilities). There are hundreds of other mosques in Ayodhya.
Unfortunately, it does. It dilly-dallied a lot on LGBT rights, which are fundamental and were sexually discriminatory. It never bothered to touch archival Muslim personal law, which is against the principle of equality before the law.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Futurist
Nov 2014
500
India
the judge who gave ayodhya verdict in favour of hindus was also involved in a sexual harassment scandal

That means nothing. In fact, when this judge became the Chief Justice, he was considered as a Congress plant. His father was a congressman and served as CM of the state of Assam for two months. This Judges act was pretty pathetic when he gave a press conference along with three other Judges of the supreme court, complaining about the then Chief Justice of India. The other three Judges were not going to be the Chief Justice, as their tenure would have ended well before the then Chief Justice retired. But this Justice Gogoi joining them cannot be justified as he was the line to become the Chief Justice of India and did indeed become one. He just had to wait some more time to bring in the reforms and transparency that they advocated at that press conference. Once Gogoi became the Chief Justice, no one heard of any action on the very points that he raised at that press conference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Futurist
Mar 2019
1,809
KL
How so? The Nazis killed innocent Jews. We are just targeting the structure that the Nazis of the era (Aurangzeb and co.) built after destroying our temple. We are just correcting a historical wrong. The real Nazis are Aurangzeb and his supporters (plenty of them among Indian Muslims, no surprise there).
yup, first try to resurrect Gandhi because your terorrists killed him, how will hindutvas correct that wrong? probably hanging some hindutvas of RSS and BJP by the noose? Marathas also destroyed many mosques, will that historical wrong be corrected?

regards
 

Aupmanyav

Ad Honorem
Jun 2014
5,814
New Delhi, India
Unfortunately, it does. It dilly-dallied a lot on LGBT rights, which are fundamental and were sexually discriminatory. It never bothered to touch archival Muslim personal law, which is against the principle of equality before the law.
No. It is not like that. Supreme Court has to follow the law made by the parliament. If the law does not permit something, Supreme Court brings it to the notice of the parliament to make suitable laws. This is an advice and not an order. Then it depends on the parliament as to what it decides. The changes in law about LGBTQ and Triple Talaq have come after parliament OKeyed it. For example, Rajiv Gandhi's government did not allow the Supreme court in case of Shahbano Begum or in case of reservations not based on caste but on economic condition. Parliament (Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha) which represents the people is the highest authority in India.
 

Aupmanyav

Ad Honorem
Jun 2014
5,814
New Delhi, India
This Judges act was pretty pathetic when he gave a press conference along with three other Judges of the supreme court, complaining about the then Chief Justice of India. The other three Judges were not going to be the Chief Justice, as their tenure would have ended well before the then Chief Justice retired. But this Justice Gogoi joining them cannot be justified as he was the line to become the Chief Justice of India and did indeed become one. He just had to wait some more time to bring in the reforms and transparency that they advocated at that press conference. Once Gogoi became the Chief Justice, no one heard of any action on the very points that he raised at that press conference.
May be he was not as forthcoming as the other Judges, perhaps wisely so. But he joined them. Whether he spoke or not, the government had no power to appoint any other judge as the Chief Justice because he was the senior-most. Breaking the tradition would have created more problems. Government has to go by the of the decision of the collegium.
 

Aupmanyav

Ad Honorem
Jun 2014
5,814
New Delhi, India
yup, first try to resurrect Gandhi because your terorrists killed him, how will hindutvas correct that wrong? probably hanging some hindutvas of RSS and BJP by the noose? Marathas also destroyed many mosques, will that historical wrong be corrected?
Gandhis killing waws an individuals act. Godse was not a member of RSS. He was with Hindu Mahasabha. I am surprised that you people are so unaware of history and make up things like a Congress member. If Muslims are aggreived for any thing, they can always approach the Supreme Court.
why was it not done in british era already when you had the opportunity, why waited till now?
The conflict began in 19th Century when British were ruling, 18 something. Check history.
 
Status
Closed