Maybe you should actually read the book. How can you criticise something you know nothing about?
I'd be interested in a more detailed rebuttal. Although I don't support the chronologies of the early dynasties of Egypt, I more or less agree with the commonly-accepted chronology of Egypt from the 18th century onwards. So for this section of the debate, I'm on dreamregent's side (though not in spirit).So you still haven't read the book. Pretty much everything you just wrote is wrong. Read the book. It will surprise you.
So you still haven't read the book. Pretty much everything you just wrote is wrong. Read the book. It will surprise you.
|Similar History Discussions||History Forum||Date|
|True age of Delhi's Iron pillar?||Asian History|
|Archduke Franz Ferdinand car - is this true||European History|
|Steven Pinker's Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined: True or mixed?||General History|
|Is it true that all former imperial metropoles were made in relation to their subjects?||General History|