- Sep 2016
It was your take, not mine. Are you crazy or what ?It wasn't my ''take'' that Jay was referring to Mazarin and Little Louis
I got it from a book written by so-called "scholar," a chaired professor.
And his footnote is the journal of the Convention, probably keeps those in the scholar "archives."
(Let me guess, you want his name, so you can tell me his not a real scholar or has the wrong bias because it varies from yours).
Why don't you illuminate us? What did John Jay it really meant? Who was he referring to?
It was you, who came here and started talking about Louis XIV being weak and some John Jay's quote. As Mastersonmcvoidson said : ,, We are not making the claim, we don't need to ''enlighten'' anyone in this case. Maybe he was referring to the princes and priests in general? Who knows. ''
Are you 15 years old or something ? What is with all ,, has the wrong bias because it varies from yours '' ?