More distractions but not evidence to support your claim.quotations are precisely made, without any edition.
you may use forum search tools to find them. the tools serve a purpose.
do you acknowledge you cannot show any direct source from taiwan.
do you acknowledge you cannot explain what is blue, green, white, orange of taiwan?
do you acknowledge you cannot show any proper debates happened inside taiwan as i have provided?
None of this is relevant to my point, if you no longer want to contest it then just say.
All you need to provide is the line(s) of text showing that self-determination is not within the UN law/agreement or even that national integrity trumps that of self-determination.
Do you have this or shall we move on?