- Nov 2010
- Stockport Cheshire UK
If you think that Churchill was serious about having Gandhi trampled by elephants, you don't really understand Churchill or the limits of power of a British PM.Let's say, for example, he went with his impulse to have Gandhi trampled to death by elephants, what do you think would have come from that? And is that a reasonable thing to desire in response to non-violent resistance? Surely a more balanced individual would reflect upon their own behaviour?