Starting a war with the USSR isn't being an armchair general, it was a political decision. In hindsight it was stupid, at the time, considering how strong Germany was after coming across two quick and decisive wins, the issue of having Great Britain and USSR in a possible future alliance (which was surely to happen eventually), plus knowledge of the Purges and the disastrous Winter War, its even questionable that the decision, as seen by available info and evidence that Hitler had in '41, was a truly bad decision. At worse, I think it was overly audacious. But just because a few very pessimistic generals said not to do it doesn't make them right. Those were the same generals that repeatedly said that Germany would suffer a major military defeat invading Poland, and invading France.Read my reply in # 6.
If and if, but if Hitler had not started an attack on the Soviet Union, Germany had been a tougher nut to crack.
But of course, when the Americans entered the game, it was just a matter of time.
His speeches when he wasnt drunk out of his mind and his impersonator had to do the speech lol.Hitler. The occasional audacious bit of brilliance, a knack for fine detail that often escaped the generals who should have known was impressive, but his insistence for the bulwark "fortress city" defense strategy from '43 onward was quite destructive. He should have just appointed Model or some other very competent general as the theater commander for the OstHeer and stuck to the big picture instead of trying to play general.
Churchill. His entire career he believed himself to be greatly skilled but he was the worst sort of amateur. WW1 and WW2 would have been more successful had everyone just ignored what he said. Very good at giving speeches though, he should have just stuck to that!
Pretty much every US president after FDR. I'd say the worst were LBJ (poorly micromanaging Vietnam) and GWB (poorly micromanaging Iraq and Afghanistan).
It is kind of a myth that Hitler was stupid militarily made up by prideful prussian generals that couldnt take accountability for any misstakes they themselves made.Adolf Hitler.Fortunately, otherwise the German army might have won WWII ?
Are you referring to this? Finest hour for actor who was Churchill's radio voiceHis speeches when he wasnt drunk out of his mind and his impersonator had to do the speech lol.
Even after the late '42 counter offensive that essentially booted German forces out of the Caucuses Hitler still intended to invade again, which is why he kept a large amount of German forces inside the Caucuses still, forces that could have been better used to stabilize other portions of the line under attack. By '43, Hitler gave up on the Caucuses but was denying operational retreat because the threat it posed to his allies. Every step west Germany took was one in which the Soviets were closer to Hungary, Romania, etc, and Hitler needed those allies. His general staff generals, as part of their warped Kriegsacademie education, ignored politics and grand strategy, they focused purely on operational arts, so for them it made perfect sense to have a very elastic front line, because not a single one of them considered the importance of something as simple as Romanian oil or Ukraine wheat or Donbass coal or iron, let alone the importance of not appearing weak to allies who contributed entire armies to the Ostfront but were starting to drastically rethink their alliance with Germany.Also during and after stalingrad hitler made his soldiers stand their ground nomatter what because the caucassus oil was the only thing that could save germany. They had to miraculously win nomatter what in fall blau or everything was lost innevitably. As long as the germans had the oil for their planes and tanks they would roll over the russians and allies but when it ran out they were doomed.
Okay, okay, I understood the point and I promise solemnly that I will never again comment on WWII, unless it is specifically about my country of birth.It is kind of a myth that Hitler was stupid militarily made up by prideful prussian generals that couldnt take accountability for any misstakes they themselves made.
Hitler made misstakes but he also made many right calls that payed off despite not having any formal military education.
When it comes to the stand fast order that saved army group center after the failed battle of moscow because the soviet counterattack would have broken the germans if they didnt dig in and that turned out to be a saving move. Also during and after stalingrad hitler made his soldiers stand their ground nomatter what because the caucassus oil was the only thing that could save germany. They had to miraculously win nomatter what in fall blau or everything was lost innevitably. As long as the germans had the oil for their planes and tanks they would roll over the russians and allies but when it ran out they were doomed.
Like Caligula is said to have made his horse a senator and nero is said to have burnt down rome and danced around in the flames people like to blame everything on the guy ontop because it is convenient and its an easy way to explain things.
Caligula made joked about making his horse a senator, as far as i know his army didnt declare on neptune and nero didnt burn down rome and dance in the flames that is all made up.
You can comment. Just keep an open mind. Some people have spent the last couple years reading an untold number of books while obsessing over Germany's role in WW2. They post on Historum, they know a lot, and are great sources for info.Okay, okay, I understood the point and I promise solemnly that I will never again comment on WWII, unless it is specifically about my country of birth.
|Similar History Discussions||History Forum||Date|
|Karl Mack: The Worst General of the Napoleonic Wars?||Military History|
|The Best and Worst Habsburgs||European History|
|Was being a person of color during the New World slavery era one of the worst times & conditions to be alive throughout history?||General History|
|Worst case outcome of the 1990s Bosnian War||Speculative History|