Would the world be that bad if there is a Chinese superpower?

Dan Howard

Ad Honorem
Aug 2014
3,569
Australia
CSC fund is purly based on academic levels, scores and papers.
Keep telling yourself that it is fair and impartial and that those scores and papers are not adjusted because of political affiliation or financial "gifts". I have personally seen fraudulent certifications where the student claims to have passed a specific prerequisite subject yet when tested over here they have no knowledge of it at all. Some schools over here don't give a crap so long as they get paid but our corruption watchdogs are cracking down on that.
Australian unis should take responsibility for corrupt practices in international education
Media releases - Independent Commission Against Corruption Website

it is the fair fund of chinese nation. most hard working chinese students relies on CSC fund because foreign gov/universities sponsor little on chinese students, while not every one is rich enough to privately pay the money of education.

no idea why it would be described as lackies of ccp.
The CCP is complaining because some of their children's applications are being given extra scrutiny. No applications have been refused so far. Only 1-3% of all applications have suffered any delay at all and only 3 or 4 students last year had to change their plans and go elsewhere to study. That's four students out of two hundred thousand or 0.002%
 
Last edited:

heylouis

Ad Honorem
Apr 2013
6,209
China
Keep telling yourself that it is fair and impartial and that those scores and papers are not adjusted because of political affiliation or financial "gifts". I have personally seen fraudulent certifications where the student claims to have passed a specific prerequisite subject yet when tested over here they have no knowledge of it at all. Some schools over here don't give a crap so long as they get paid but our corruption watchdogs are cracking down on that.
Australian unis should take responsibility for corrupt practices in international education
Media releases - Independent Commission Against Corruption Website
academic fraud exists in any nation.

what you linked has nothing to do with CSC fund. you are not only a bad reader but also a red herring abuser.


The CCP is complaining because some of their children's applications are being given extra scrutiny. No applications have been refused so far. Only 1-3% of all applications have suffered any delay at all and only 3 or 4 students last year had to change their plans and go elsewhere to study. That's four students out of two hundred thousand or 0.002%
it is already realized that the australian is using tactically delay as an alternative of refusal.
 
Feb 2011
6,037
Accusing others of being government agents <----- That's what a government agent would do. Ironic.


I see a lot of guilty by association. Receiving Chinese Scholarship Council funding implies they are children of evil CCP members? How do you know they aren't children of CCP pencil pushers, farmers/herders/fishers(30 percent of CCP members), white collar workers (25 percent of CCP members), or non-CCP members (most Chinese people)? Yes there may be fraud, does that mean everybody with CSC funding is discredited? Maybe, just maybe, they just work hard? Plenty of countries fund their students overseas, because some of them commit fraud, we blanket all of them as children of evil parents or something? And when they deny this, they're paid government agents?
 
Last edited:

Dan Howard

Ad Honorem
Aug 2014
3,569
Australia
it is already realized that the australian is using tactically delay as an alternative of refusal.
0.002% of applications resulted in students being unable to come here to Australia. If we didn't want Chinese students to come to Australia, there are plenty of easier and more effective ways to achieve it.
 

heylouis

Ad Honorem
Apr 2013
6,209
China
You think we are engaged in a debate? You are simply spouting the approved party line and I am simply pointing this out. No debate involved.
what you can do?

you are unable to show an actual evidence chinese students stole australian academic properties.
you are unable to show an actual evidence of academic fraud committed by CSC funded students.
you are unable to do anything useful to prove anything your hatred

are not you a loser?
a stupid loser who can do nothing but repeatedly spouting about parties parties parties.
a machine robot could do that too.

don't even insult a loser. a loser tried, worked, but only failed. you are worse.
 
Feb 2011
6,037
Mainstream media has a bad habit of misrepresenting countries, but news which riles people further into war is highly, highly irresponsible to an entirely new level:

Sinking US aircraft carriers will resolve tension in South China Sea, says Chinese admiral
China’s plot to force US ‘surrender’

So a Chinese 'admiral' threatened the US of sinking two of our aircraft carriers.

What the news left out:
1. The Chinese 'admiral' is a glorified pencil pusher and internet commentator, he commands as many troops as Alex Jones.
2. He did not 'threaten' the US, the message was meant for a domestic audience.
3. He says China should not match building aircraft carriers to the numbers that the US has, China only needs the capability to sink one or two aircraft carriers to act as a deterrence.
4. He is not saying China should sink American aircraft carriers, but only maintain the capability to sink carriers rather than building more Chinese aircraft carriers. "Wanting to sink" and "wanting the capability to sink" are miles and miles apart. The news make it sound like China's preparing for a first strike.

What he actually said:
现在美国有11艘航空母舰,我们是不是要发展12艘航母,才能跟美国抗衡呢?我觉得这种思路错了,我们不能搞军备竞赛。历史的经验告诉我们,美国最怕死人。我们现在有东风21D、东风26导弹,这是航母杀手锏,我们击沉它一艘航母,让它伤亡5000人,击沉两艘,伤亡一万人,你看美国怕不怕?所以,我们军工总师也要考虑从美国的软肋去发展。

Translation:
Right now the United States have 11 aircraft carriers, do we really need to build 12 aircraft carriers to achieve parity? I think this is the wrong path, we cannot start an arms raise. From history, the United States was most afraid of casualties. We have DongFeng 21D and Dongfeng 26, these are carrier killers. Sinking one carrier will cause 5000 casualties, 2 carriers will cause 10,000 casualties. Don't you think the US would be afraid? So our military engineers should focus on the weak points of the US.

Again, the guy's not an actual admiral, not even close.
 
Last edited:

Similar History Discussions