The 1960s Divorce Revolution in America

Joined Feb 2023
276 Posts | 416+
Colorado
The 1960s Divorce Revolution in America
For most of United States’ history, divorce was a rare occurrence and an insignificant feature of family and social relationships. In the first sixty years of the twentieth century, divorce became more common, but it was hardly commonplace. After 1960, the rate of divorce in the US accelerated at a dazzling pace. It doubled in roughly a decade and continued its upward climb until the early 1980s, when it stabilized at the highest level among advanced Western societies.

Prior to 1960, divorce was generally considered to be against the public interest, and civil courts refused to grant a divorce except if one party to the marriage had betrayed the "innocent spouse." Thus, a spouse suing for divorce in most states had to show a "fault" such as abandonment, cruelty, incurable mental illness, or adultery. If an "innocent" husband and wife wished to separate, or if both were guilty, neither spouse would be allowed to escape the bonds of marriage.

1684167702845.png

By the mid- to late 19th century, divorce rates in the United States were growing steadily, and Americans obtained more divorces annually than were granted in all of Europe. The popular acceptance of divorce as an alternative to marital unhappiness, decay of the belief in immortality and future punishment, discontent with the existing constitution of society, the habits of mobility created by better transportation, and the greater independence of women resulting in their enlarged legal rights and greater opportunities of self-support, as well as the reduction in cost of obtaining a divorce all contributed to the growing trend. The divorce rate grew from 3 couples per thousand in 1890, to 8 couples per thousand by 1920.

The rate of divorce continued its upward trend through the 1940s and 1950s, spiking at the end of the Second World War, when both the rate of marriage and rate of divorce coincided to reach a high point. The increased divorce rate was somewhat aided by reductions in residency requirements in some states such as Nevada, Idaho and Arkansas; and internationally in Mexico and France that promoted connections to their hospitality industries.

Beginning in the late 1950s, Americans began to change their ideas about the individual's obligations to family and society and how these ideas have shaped a culture of divorce. The making of a divorce culture can be described as a change away from an ethic of obligation to others and a more acute consciousness of their responsibility to attend to their own individual needs and interests. This new thinking suggested that there was the moral obligation to look after oneself that was at least as important as the moral obligation to look after others.

1684167765293.png
Marriage and Divorce Rates in the US Since 1870

During the 1960s, the American Bar Association created a Family Law section in many state courts, and pushed strongly for no-fault divorce legislation. In 1969, California became the first state to pass a no-fault divorce law. The introduction of no-fault divorce that allowed unilateral action and lent moral legitimacy to the process, opened the floodgates in the 1970s leading to a dramatic rise in divorce rates in the United States.

Multiple changes in American social structure coincided in the 1960s and 1970s to contribute to the divorce revolution. Spouses found it easier to find extramarital partners, and came to have higher, and often unrealistic, expectations of their marital relationships. Increases in women's employment coupled with new career opportunities did their part to drive up the divorce rate, as wives felt freer in the late 1960s and 1970s to leave marriages that were abusive or that they found unsatisfying.

Many mainline Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish leaders were caught up in the spirit of the cultural changes, and lent explicit or implicit support to the divorce revolution sweeping across American society. The 1970s marked the period when, for many Americans, a more institutional model of marriage was shattered. In the older, institutional model of marriage, parents were supposed to stick together for their sake. The view was that divorce could leave an indelible emotional scar on children, and would also harm their social and economic future. In 1962 about half of American women agreed with the idea that "when there are children in the family parents should stay together even if they don't get along." By 1977, only 20% of American women held this view.

1684167871605.png

All states now allow no-fault divorce on grounds such as irreconcilable differences, irremediable breakdown, and loss of affection; and all states recognize divorces granted by any other state, along with the imposition of a minimum time of residence to file for a divorce. Nevada and Idaho currently being the shortest at six weeks. Some states mandate a separation period before no-fault divorce. Mississippi, South Dakota and Tennessee are the only states that require mutual consent for no-fault divorce. The rest of the states permit unilateral no-fault divorce.

The Great Disruption by Francis Fukuyama. Free Press publishers, 2000.

The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America by Lenore Weitzman. Free Press publishers, 1985.

“Escape from the Gilded Cage”, by April White. Smithsonian Magazine, June 2022.
 
Joined Feb 2023
276 Posts | 416+
Colorado
In 1966, New York governor Nelson Rockefeller, whose wife, Mary Clark, had divorced him in 1962 (on the grounds of “extreme mental cruelty) after six weeks residence in Reno, Nevada, signed into law a bill recognizing five grounds for divorce in New York, including cruelty and abandonment. Previously New York had only recognized adultery as a valid reason.

1684168064584.png
Mary Clark and Nelson Rockefeller at their wedding in 1930

California governor Ronald Reagan signed the first no-fault divorce law in the nation in 1969, allowing spouses to separate without a finding of guilt. The new law eliminated the need for couples to fabricate spousal wrongdoing in pursuit of a divorce. One likely reason for Reagan's decision to sign the bill was that his first wife, Jane Wyman, had unfairly accused him of "mental cruelty" to obtain a divorce in 1948.

1684168105811.png
Ronald Reagan and Jane Wyman

In signing the bill, Reagan made what he later claimed was the biggest mistake of his political life, lamenting that no-fault divorce had gutted marriage of its legal power to bind husband and wife, allowing one spouse to dissolve a marriage for any reason, or for no reason at all.

By 1977, all but three states had a no-fault divorce option. New York was the last state to institute a no-fault statute in 2010.
 
Joined Feb 2023
276 Posts | 416+
Colorado
There has always been a hodge-podge of state divorce laws. The most permissive laws in the US existed at the fringes of the settled country, where a settler fell under the jurisdiction of local courts after a brief residency. It was acknowledgement of the transitive nature of pioneer life, but it was also an opportunity for divorce seekers.

In the 1840s and 1850s, Ohio and Indiana were popular destinations for divorce, before their residency requirements were lengthened. In the 1860s, Illinois earned a reputation for quickly severing marriages, and Iowa gained similar fame in the 1870s and 1880s. In 1891, South Dakota, with one of the shortest residency requirements in the country at just 90 days, became the top destination for wealthy divorce seekers from the east.

A considerable cottage industry developed in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, catering to visitors seeking “temporary” residency and a divorce. Agents met their customers at the train station and directed them to appropriate accommodations and to the lawyers that specialized in divorce cases.
 
Joined Jul 2020
23,778 Posts | 9,439+
Culver City , Ca
The 1960s Divorce Revolution in America
For most of United States’ history, divorce was a rare occurrence and an insignificant feature of family and social relationships. In the first sixty years of the twentieth century, divorce became more common, but it was hardly commonplace. After 1960, the rate of divorce in the US accelerated at a dazzling pace. It doubled in roughly a decade and continued its upward climb until the early 1980s, when it stabilized at the highest level among advanced Western societies.

Prior to 1960, divorce was generally considered to be against the public interest, and civil courts refused to grant a divorce except if one party to the marriage had betrayed the "innocent spouse." Thus, a spouse suing for divorce in most states had to show a "fault" such as abandonment, cruelty, incurable mental illness, or adultery. If an "innocent" husband and wife wished to separate, or if both were guilty, neither spouse would be allowed to escape the bonds of marriage.

View attachment 63276

By the mid- to late 19th century, divorce rates in the United States were growing steadily, and Americans obtained more divorces annually than were granted in all of Europe. The popular acceptance of divorce as an alternative to marital unhappiness, decay of the belief in immortality and future punishment, discontent with the existing constitution of society, the habits of mobility created by better transportation, and the greater independence of women resulting in their enlarged legal rights and greater opportunities of self-support, as well as the reduction in cost of obtaining a divorce all contributed to the growing trend. The divorce rate grew from 3 couples per thousand in 1890, to 8 couples per thousand by 1920.

The rate of divorce continued its upward trend through the 1940s and 1950s, spiking at the end of the Second World War, when both the rate of marriage and rate of divorce coincided to reach a high point. The increased divorce rate was somewhat aided by reductions in residency requirements in some states such as Nevada, Idaho and Arkansas; and internationally in Mexico and France that promoted connections to their hospitality industries.

Beginning in the late 1950s, Americans began to change their ideas about the individual's obligations to family and society and how these ideas have shaped a culture of divorce. The making of a divorce culture can be described as a change away from an ethic of obligation to others and a more acute consciousness of their responsibility to attend to their own individual needs and interests. This new thinking suggested that there was the moral obligation to look after oneself that was at least as important as the moral obligation to look after others.

View attachment 63277
Marriage and Divorce Rates in the US Since 1870

During the 1960s, the American Bar Association created a Family Law section in many state courts, and pushed strongly for no-fault divorce legislation. In 1969, California became the first state to pass a no-fault divorce law. The introduction of no-fault divorce that allowed unilateral action and lent moral legitimacy to the process, opened the floodgates in the 1970s leading to a dramatic rise in divorce rates in the United States.

Multiple changes in American social structure coincided in the 1960s and 1970s to contribute to the divorce revolution. Spouses found it easier to find extramarital partners, and came to have higher, and often unrealistic, expectations of their marital relationships. Increases in women's employment coupled with new career opportunities did their part to drive up the divorce rate, as wives felt freer in the late 1960s and 1970s to leave marriages that were abusive or that they found unsatisfying.

Many mainline Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish leaders were caught up in the spirit of the cultural changes, and lent explicit or implicit support to the divorce revolution sweeping across American society. The 1970s marked the period when, for many Americans, a more institutional model of marriage was shattered. In the older, institutional model of marriage, parents were supposed to stick together for their sake. The view was that divorce could leave an indelible emotional scar on children, and would also harm their social and economic future. In 1962 about half of American women agreed with the idea that "when there are children in the family parents should stay together even if they don't get along." By 1977, only 20% of American women held this view.

View attachment 63278

All states now allow no-fault divorce on grounds such as irreconcilable differences, irremediable breakdown, and loss of affection; and all states recognize divorces granted by any other state, along with the imposition of a minimum time of residence to file for a divorce. Nevada and Idaho currently being the shortest at six weeks. Some states mandate a separation period before no-fault divorce. Mississippi, South Dakota and Tennessee are the only states that require mutual consent for no-fault divorce. The rest of the states permit unilateral no-fault divorce.

The Great Disruption by Francis Fukuyama. Free Press publishers, 2000.

The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America by Lenore Weitzman. Free Press publishers, 1985.

“Escape from the Gilded Cage”, by April White. Smithsonian Magazine, June 2022.
Reno , Nevada's economy was for decades of the first half of the 20th Century was based quite a bit in divorce and gambling as it is close to the world famous Ski Resorts and summertime vacationers at Lake Tahoe on the California - Nevada border. Many movies where made about Reno's divorce industry but many have not survived the ravages of time .
Leftyhunter
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawk1981
Joined Aug 2016
12,409 Posts | 8,403+
Dispargum
I wouldn't say that divorce was rare in the 1950s. In the 1950s about 25% of all marriages ended in divorce. Since 1970 the divorce rate has been about 50%. The rate has increased, but divorced people had always existed. If the divorce rate was low in the 19th century it was probably because unhappy spouses just left without obtaining the formality of a divorce. With increased communications the ability to disappear decreased and more people had to formally divorce. Any claim that married life was easier or happier in the past is probably false.
 
Joined Jun 2014
17,822 Posts | 9,478+
Lisbon, Portugal
I wouldn't say that divorce was rare in the 1950s. In the 1950s about 25% of all marriages ended in divorce. Since 1970 the divorce rate has been about 50%. The rate has increased, but divorced people had always existed. If the divorce rate was low in the 19th century it was probably because unhappy spouses just left without obtaining the formality of a divorce. With increased communications the ability to disappear decreased and more people had to formally divorce. Any claim that married life was easier or happier in the past is probably false.
Before women's emancipation, and before the universalization of the nuclear family-household, married women wouldn't have a chance to make a divorce and continue their lives as divorcees successfully.
 
Joined Jun 2020
842 Posts | 470+
California
Last edited:
A thought, the rise of divorce- and the decline of children- began after the Catholics' catastrophic council in the 60s; they liberalized, and Protestants followed suit. The age of secularism accelerated. It seems there's a connection between religion and marital endurance.
 
Joined Jun 2014
17,822 Posts | 9,478+
Lisbon, Portugal
A thought, the rise of divorce- and the decline of children- began after the Catholics' catastrophic council in the 60s; they liberalized, and Protestants followed suit. The age of secularism began, There's a connection between religion and marital endurance.
Mainline Protestant churches began liberalizing themselves a generation earlier than what the Catholic Church did during the Vatican Second.

And claiming that the age of secularism began with institutional and ideological change of those respective churches, is giving way too much credit and initiative to this particular institution, and making a very oversimplified and easily digestible explanation.

The liberalization of those churches emerges out or is the product of, the overall secularization of society that predates what those churches did. The Age of secularism began far earlier than that, and it's the consequence of modernity - as a very complex socio-economic and psychological transformation of the individual and society - rather than simply as a consequence of the Catholic Church changing its ideology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawk1981
Joined Jun 2020
842 Posts | 470+
California
Of course, it's simplifying but there's a kernel of truth. An excerpt from a 2-year-old thread:

Islam enjoys the advantage of decentralization that inhibits their elites from tinkering with a time-proven package thus, convening a 'council' liberalizing that faith becomes structurally impossible. The command compelling a Muslim to pray five times a day, the Salah, will never be abrogated for sound reasons based on human nature, however it's honored in the breach. And it seems there's a strong correlation between high birth rates and religious affiliation; the most uncompromising, innovation-resistant faiths breed more prolifically. (compare Reform Judaism to the Orthodox varieties). A chart on Catholic fertility:

1638738784607-png.51153


Notice the rapid decline after the Vatican Council II closed. But we're off-topic, this thread began on the subject of divorce. (Although it's somewhat relevant)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawk1981
Joined Feb 2023
276 Posts | 416+
Colorado
By 1916, the United States led the world in number of divorces. In populous New York State, where adultery was the only grounds for divorce, attorneys would provide a divorce package of a prostitute and a photographer. Significant numbers of divorce seekers went to the cities on the Mexican side of the Mexico-US border, or to Haiti where they found welcoming attorneys, who sometimes advertised in US newspapers.

1684209673459.png

Reno, Nevada, became "the divorce capital of the world" in the 1910s. At that time, only six months in Nevada established state residency, and the Nevada courts, well aware of the contribution of divorce seekers to Nevada's hospitality industry, accepted the resident's uncorroborated assertion of grounds for divorce, usually "extreme cruelty." In 1927, the Nevada Legislature, "in response to a perceived threat to Reno's divorce supremacy from France and Mexico and a divorce-trade war that had been going on since the end of World War I between Nevada, Idaho, and Arkansas," lowered the residency period to three months, and in 1931 the Legislature that voted for "wide-open gambling" lowered it to six weeks. Providing accommodations and other amenities for visitors, who could not leave Nevada during the six weeks, became a major Reno industry; greeters met the arriving trains, and there were a variety of divorce ranches.

In 1942, the US Supreme Court ruled in Williams v North Carolina that states had to recognize bona fide divorces granted by other states, under the "full faith and credit" clause of the US Constitution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leftyhunter
Joined Jul 2020
23,778 Posts | 9,439+
Culver City , Ca
The 1960s Divorce Revolution in America
For most of United States’ history, divorce was a rare occurrence and an insignificant feature of family and social relationships. In the first sixty years of the twentieth century, divorce became more common, but it was hardly commonplace. After 1960, the rate of divorce in the US accelerated at a dazzling pace. It doubled in roughly a decade and continued its upward climb until the early 1980s, when it stabilized at the highest level among advanced Western societies.

Prior to 1960, divorce was generally considered to be against the public interest, and civil courts refused to grant a divorce except if one party to the marriage had betrayed the "innocent spouse." Thus, a spouse suing for divorce in most states had to show a "fault" such as abandonment, cruelty, incurable mental illness, or adultery. If an "innocent" husband and wife wished to separate, or if both were guilty, neither spouse would be allowed to escape the bonds of marriage.

View attachment 63276

By the mid- to late 19th century, divorce rates in the United States were growing steadily, and Americans obtained more divorces annually than were granted in all of Europe. The popular acceptance of divorce as an alternative to marital unhappiness, decay of the belief in immortality and future punishment, discontent with the existing constitution of society, the habits of mobility created by better transportation, and the greater independence of women resulting in their enlarged legal rights and greater opportunities of self-support, as well as the reduction in cost of obtaining a divorce all contributed to the growing trend. The divorce rate grew from 3 couples per thousand in 1890, to 8 couples per thousand by 1920.

The rate of divorce continued its upward trend through the 1940s and 1950s, spiking at the end of the Second World War, when both the rate of marriage and rate of divorce coincided to reach a high point. The increased divorce rate was somewhat aided by reductions in residency requirements in some states such as Nevada, Idaho and Arkansas; and internationally in Mexico and France that promoted connections to their hospitality industries.

Beginning in the late 1950s, Americans began to change their ideas about the individual's obligations to family and society and how these ideas have shaped a culture of divorce. The making of a divorce culture can be described as a change away from an ethic of obligation to others and a more acute consciousness of their responsibility to attend to their own individual needs and interests. This new thinking suggested that there was the moral obligation to look after oneself that was at least as important as the moral obligation to look after others.

View attachment 63277
Marriage and Divorce Rates in the US Since 1870

During the 1960s, the American Bar Association created a Family Law section in many state courts, and pushed strongly for no-fault divorce legislation. In 1969, California became the first state to pass a no-fault divorce law. The introduction of no-fault divorce that allowed unilateral action and lent moral legitimacy to the process, opened the floodgates in the 1970s leading to a dramatic rise in divorce rates in the United States.

Multiple changes in American social structure coincided in the 1960s and 1970s to contribute to the divorce revolution. Spouses found it easier to find extramarital partners, and came to have higher, and often unrealistic, expectations of their marital relationships. Increases in women's employment coupled with new career opportunities did their part to drive up the divorce rate, as wives felt freer in the late 1960s and 1970s to leave marriages that were abusive or that they found unsatisfying.

Many mainline Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish leaders were caught up in the spirit of the cultural changes, and lent explicit or implicit support to the divorce revolution sweeping across American society. The 1970s marked the period when, for many Americans, a more institutional model of marriage was shattered. In the older, institutional model of marriage, parents were supposed to stick together for their sake. The view was that divorce could leave an indelible emotional scar on children, and would also harm their social and economic future. In 1962 about half of American women agreed with the idea that "when there are children in the family parents should stay together even if they don't get along." By 1977, only 20% of American women held this view.

View attachment 63278

All states now allow no-fault divorce on grounds such as irreconcilable differences, irremediable breakdown, and loss of affection; and all states recognize divorces granted by any other state, along with the imposition of a minimum time of residence to file for a divorce. Nevada and Idaho currently being the shortest at six weeks. Some states mandate a separation period before no-fault divorce. Mississippi, South Dakota and Tennessee are the only states that require mutual consent for no-fault divorce. The rest of the states permit unilateral no-fault divorce.

The Great Disruption by Francis Fukuyama. Free Press publishers, 2000.

The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America by Lenore Weitzman. Free Press publishers, 1985.

“Escape from the Gilded Cage”, by April White. Smithsonian Magazine, June 2022.
For men especially does if means it can be argued marriage simply doesn't make financial or even emotional sense. The chance of being divorced is at least fifty percent in the US and especially if said couple has children divorce is not inexpensive. The more money one has the more one has to loose and if you don't believe ask Paul McCartney.
It actually makes more sense to put half of ones net worth on one spin of the roulette wheelin a European casino red or black and one at least has a 48. 50 percent chance of doubling ones money.
That's why for a growing number of men they just avoid marriage and or cohabitating altogether.
Leftyhunter
 
Joined Apr 2015
7,387 Posts | 2,040+
India
For men especially does if means it can be argued marriage simply doesn't make financial or even emotional sense. The chance of being divorced is at least fifty percent in the US and especially if said couple has children divorce is not inexpensive. The more money one has the more one has to loose and if you don't believe ask Paul McCartney.
It actually makes more sense to put half of ones net worth on one spin of the roulette wheelin a European casino red or black and one at least has a 48. 50 percent chance of doubling ones money.
That's why for a growing number of men they just avoid marriage and or cohabitating altogether.
Leftyhunter

Widespread divorce destroy families and brings mental trauma among growing kids.
 
  • Like
Reactions: History Learner
Joined Jul 2020
23,778 Posts | 9,439+
Culver City , Ca
Widespread divorce destroy families and brings mental trauma among growing kids.
No kidding I went through all that back in the 1970s. On the other hand maybe marriage needs to go the way of the Dodo bird. I can't speak for what is happening outside the US but the juice is not worth the squeeze . Besides divorce their is plenty of domestic violence plus I untold stress. More likely then not if American prostitutes didn't have married clientele they would starve to death. If marriage was meant to work it would work but it's not so it doesn't .
Leftyhunter
 
Joined Jun 2014
17,822 Posts | 9,478+
Lisbon, Portugal
Last edited:
Of course, it's simplifying but there's a kernel of truth. An excerpt from a 2-year-old thread:

Islam enjoys the advantage of decentralization that inhibits their elites from tinkering with a time-proven package thus, convening a 'council' liberalizing that faith becomes structurally impossible. The command compelling a Muslim to pray five times a day, the Salah, will never be abrogated for sound reasons based on human nature, however it's honored in the breach. And it seems there's a strong correlation between high birth rates and religious affiliation; the most uncompromising, innovation-resistant faiths breed more prolifically. (compare Reform Judaism to the Orthodox varieties). A chart on Catholic fertility:

1638738784607-png.51153


Notice the rapid decline after the Vatican Council II closed. But we're off-topic, this thread began on the subject of divorce. (Although it's somewhat relevant)
Correlation doesn't imply causation.

Besides, why does your graph start in 1960, and not earlier? It's impossible to make an argument that the fertility rate has been reducing since the 19th century if the graph only takes back to 1960. The baby boom phenomenon of the late 40s to early 60s was actually an anomaly within Western modern demographic history.

Islam is just as unwilling to liberalize itself, as Christian churches and denominations in Africa, and some parts of Latin America, are. It's more of a factor that in developed Western countries, the secular ruling elites fought against the church and won, and now they get all the political and social power, just as heavy urbanization, consumerism, and the existence of comprehensive state welfare policies basically replaced the social role of the church. The other factor is that Islam went through major reform since the late 18th century and was later on able to effectively politicize itself within a modern political context and modern identity politics. Christianity was not as successful - apart from a few countries - because secular forces were much more militant and powerful, ever since the French Revolution.
 
Joined Oct 2010
17,025 Posts | 4,448+
The 1960s Divorce Revolution in America
For most of United States’ history, divorce was a rare occurrence and an insignificant feature of family and social relationships. In the first sixty years of the twentieth century, divorce became more common, but it was hardly commonplace. After 1960, the rate of divorce in the US accelerated at a dazzling pace. It doubled in roughly a decade and continued its upward climb until the early 1980s, when it stabilized at the highest level among advanced Western societies.

Prior to 1960, divorce was generally considered to be against the public interest, and civil courts refused to grant a divorce except if one party to the marriage had betrayed the "innocent spouse." Thus, a spouse suing for divorce in most states had to show a "fault" such as abandonment, cruelty, incurable mental illness, or adultery. If an "innocent" husband and wife wished to separate, or if both were guilty, neither spouse would be allowed to escape the bonds of marriage.

View attachment 63276

By the mid- to late 19th century, divorce rates in the United States were growing steadily, and Americans obtained more divorces annually than were granted in all of Europe. The popular acceptance of divorce as an alternative to marital unhappiness, decay of the belief in immortality and future punishment, discontent with the existing constitution of society, the habits of mobility created by better transportation, and the greater independence of women resulting in their enlarged legal rights and greater opportunities of self-support, as well as the reduction in cost of obtaining a divorce all contributed to the growing trend. The divorce rate grew from 3 couples per thousand in 1890, to 8 couples per thousand by 1920.

The rate of divorce continued its upward trend through the 1940s and 1950s, spiking at the end of the Second World War, when both the rate of marriage and rate of divorce coincided to reach a high point. The increased divorce rate was somewhat aided by reductions in residency requirements in some states such as Nevada, Idaho and Arkansas; and internationally in Mexico and France that promoted connections to their hospitality industries.

Beginning in the late 1950s, Americans began to change their ideas about the individual's obligations to family and society and how these ideas have shaped a culture of divorce. The making of a divorce culture can be described as a change away from an ethic of obligation to others and a more acute consciousness of their responsibility to attend to their own individual needs and interests. This new thinking suggested that there was the moral obligation to look after oneself that was at least as important as the moral obligation to look after others.

View attachment 63277
Marriage and Divorce Rates in the US Since 1870

During the 1960s, the American Bar Association created a Family Law section in many state courts, and pushed strongly for no-fault divorce legislation. In 1969, California became the first state to pass a no-fault divorce law. The introduction of no-fault divorce that allowed unilateral action and lent moral legitimacy to the process, opened the floodgates in the 1970s leading to a dramatic rise in divorce rates in the United States.

Multiple changes in American social structure coincided in the 1960s and 1970s to contribute to the divorce revolution. Spouses found it easier to find extramarital partners, and came to have higher, and often unrealistic, expectations of their marital relationships. Increases in women's employment coupled with new career opportunities did their part to drive up the divorce rate, as wives felt freer in the late 1960s and 1970s to leave marriages that were abusive or that they found unsatisfying.

Many mainline Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish leaders were caught up in the spirit of the cultural changes, and lent explicit or implicit support to the divorce revolution sweeping across American society. The 1970s marked the period when, for many Americans, a more institutional model of marriage was shattered. In the older, institutional model of marriage, parents were supposed to stick together for their sake. The view was that divorce could leave an indelible emotional scar on children, and would also harm their social and economic future. In 1962 about half of American women agreed with the idea that "when there are children in the family parents should stay together even if they don't get along." By 1977, only 20% of American women held this view.

View attachment 63278

All states now allow no-fault divorce on grounds such as irreconcilable differences, irremediable breakdown, and loss of affection; and all states recognize divorces granted by any other state, along with the imposition of a minimum time of residence to file for a divorce. Nevada and Idaho currently being the shortest at six weeks. Some states mandate a separation period before no-fault divorce. Mississippi, South Dakota and Tennessee are the only states that require mutual consent for no-fault divorce. The rest of the states permit unilateral no-fault divorce.

The Great Disruption by Francis Fukuyama. Free Press publishers, 2000.

The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America by Lenore Weitzman. Free Press publishers, 1985.

“Escape from the Gilded Cage”, by April White. Smithsonian Magazine, June 2022.

I think it;s not that useful to just look at teh divorce rate in the past. Weather the legally a couple stayed together or not.
Seperation with out divorce, was probably much bigger to now. Marriages were ending just not legally.

I think the deabte would be more comparable if the overall sepertaion rate was compred, divorce or not.

Of course that's not as readily available as a statistic.



I
 
Joined Jun 2020
842 Posts | 470+
California
Submitted. There are three factors that make a happy and lasting marriage.
1- Communication
2- Shared beliefs
3- And no prior previous sexual activity perhaps including the eventual mates. Innocence counts.
 
Joined Oct 2010
17,025 Posts | 4,448+
Submitted. There are three factors that make a happy and lasting marriage.
1- Communication
2- Shared beliefs
3- And no prior previous sexual activity perhaps including the eventual mates. Innocence counts.

Based on what? Scientifically questionable survives carried out by those who wanted that answer?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Olleus
Joined Jul 2020
23,778 Posts | 9,439+
Culver City , Ca
Submitted. There are three factors that make a happy and lasting marriage.
1- Communication
2- Shared beliefs
3- And no prior previous sexual activity perhaps including the eventual mates. Innocence counts.
King Solomon had a better plan . Marry one thousand wives and or have concubines combined with X number of wives and see each of them at most once every year and a half for maybe two hours tops and call it good .
Leftyhunter
 
Joined Oct 2011
40,550 Posts | 7,631+
Italy, Lago Maggiore
In the Italian Republic divorce was illegal.
If a wife or a husband left the conjugal house the police carried him or her back!
Only if the marriage had canceled by a Catholic religious tribunal it was possible to divorce ...

A popular referendum changed the Italian reality in 1974. The Catholic party wanted to abrogate the new law about divorce [issued in December 1970], but it lost that referendum and so Italians were free to divorce. Before of that law Napoleon introduced a limited possibility to divorce. After the French leader Italian politicians did almost nothing ...

Anyway, it still takes a lot of time to divorce here: 3 years [and there has been a reform, the original law about divorce said that the couple had to be "separated" for 5 years before of the real divorce].
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawk1981

Trending History Discussions

Top