Were Indo-Iranians Europeans?

Status
Archived
Joined Jun 2022
6 Posts | 1+
World
Last edited:
It is well-known fact that the Indo-Iranians arose from Sintashta culture and Sintashta culture itself arose from the Corded Ware culture of Northern Europe, based on the recent data from various studies it seems that These Indo-Iranians were predominantly North and Eastern Europeans with High frequency of Light hair and eyes alongside caucasian features anthropological speaking. so can we consider Indo-Iranians and Rigvedic Heroes such as King Sudas, Priests of the Rigveda and tribes like Scythians European ? we are not allowed to discuss genetics so i will just say that a recent paper by Vagheesh et al showcases that these people had no BMAC infusion and they were still Sintashta/Andronovo by ancestry when they moved into Central Asia and India.

so we can conclude that.
Indo-Iraninas had: European Religion, European culture, European Language, European nomadism, European ancestry etc.
 
Joined Jan 2016
1,788 Posts | 344+
Collapsed wave
I doubt there is such thing as European religion or European nomadism whatever that may mean.

Indo-Iranians are a branch of the Indo-Europeans and as such share some common ancestry and language with other Indo-European tribes.

The Indo-European tribes were one of the three components, which formed the european people. The other two being Western hunter gatherers and neolithic farmers to various degrees.
 
Joined Oct 2016
11,628 Posts | 3,749+
Australia
Last edited:
It is well-known fact that the Indo-Iranians arose from Sintashta culture and Sintashta culture itself arose from the Corded Ware culture of Northern Europe, based on the recent data from various studies it seems that These Indo-Iranians were predominantly North and Eastern Europeans with High frequency of Light hair and eyes alongside caucasian features anthropological speaking. so can we consider Indo-Iranians and Rigvedic Heroes such as King Sudas, Priests of the Rigveda and tribes like Scythians European ?

I would not . Just as I would not consider some Western Hunter Gatherers 'Frenchmen' . Unfortunately some people back then ( Indo-Europeans ) are given names relating to countries that came into existence much later . Any 'European' back then is a continental description. So then the Indo Iranian would be 'Central Asian' to bring it forward . We could put it further back to 'Europe' , but why stop there ? We could say they where really African . ;)



we are not allowed to discuss genetics so i will just say that a recent paper by Vagheesh et al showcases that these people had no BMAC infusion and they were still Sintashta/Andronovo by ancestry when they moved into Central Asia and India.

I doubt they would have had BMAC 'infusion' of any type WHEN they moved into Central Asia . Perhaps a hint of it , culturally, via trade networks .

so we can conclude that.
Indo-Iraninas had: European Religion, European culture, European Language, European nomadism, European ancestry etc.


Or you could call it Sintashta/Andronovo religion, culture, Language, nomadism, ancestry etc.

That is , did those things have that distinctive Sintashta/Andronovo form in their earlier ancestry in Corded Ware Culture of Northern Europe ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Theodoric
Joined Jun 2012
15,528 Posts | 2,868+
Malaysia
Last edited:
The places where Sintashta and Andronovo arose were not yet called 'Europe' at the time the Indo-Iranian/Aryan tribes emerged, as I understand it.

I guess some guys now called Asians, like maybe some Iranians, Pakistanis, northern Indians etc. did ultimately originate from some places located in the Europe of today.

While conversely also, some Europeans of today might also have originally emerged from places located in parts of today's Asia, as I have read.
 
Joined Jun 2022
3,748 Posts | 1,350+
Norway
The places where Sintashta and Andronovo arose were not yet called 'Europe' at the time the Indo-Iranian/Aryan tribes emerged, as I understand it.

I guess some guys now called Asians, like maybe some Iranians, Pakistanis, northern Indians etc. did ultimately originate from some places located in the Europe of today.

While conversely also, some Europeans of today might also have originally emerged from places located in parts of today's Asia, as I have read.

Because there was no Word for european back then doesnt mean that populations we would classify as europeans today didnt exist earlier.

I wont go into genetics so you can Google tarmin mummies yourself. Point being that there were people with what we would recognize as european features found in modern day China, dated to around 2000bc
 
Joined Jun 2012
15,528 Posts | 2,868+
Malaysia
Last edited:
Depends what you mean or consider as 'European features'.

I mean, some guys might be more focused on hair colour, eye colour or skin tone.

While some others might be more inclined to consider face and/or head shape, eye shape, nose shape etc.
 
Joined Jun 2022
3,748 Posts | 1,350+
Norway
Depends what you mean or consider as 'European features'.

I mean, some guys might be more focused on hair colour, eye colour or skin tone.

While some others might be more inclined to consider face and/or head shape, eye shape, nose shape etc.
All of the above, its not exactly hard to tell the difference between these to groups just by looking at them.

From article Linked below:

" Since the late 1990s, the discovery of hundreds of naturally mummified human remains dating to circa 2,000 BCE to 200 CE in the region’s Tarim Basin has attracted international attention due to their so-called ‘Western’ physical appearance, their felted and woven woolen clothing, and their agropastoral economy that included cattle, sheep and goat, wheat, barley, millet, and even kefir cheese. Buried in boat coffins in an otherwise barren desert, the Tarim Basin mummies have long puzzled scientists and inspired numerous theories as to their enigmatic origins. "


(Cant qoute the rest of the article, but If you want to take a look, there you go)
 
Joined Jun 2014
17,822 Posts | 9,478+
Lisbon, Portugal
All of the above, its not exactly hard to tell the difference between these to groups just by looking at them.

From article Linked below:

" Since the late 1990s, the discovery of hundreds of naturally mummified human remains dating to circa 2,000 BCE to 200 CE in the region’s Tarim Basin has attracted international attention due to their so-called ‘Western’ physical appearance, their felted and woven woolen clothing, and their agropastoral economy that included cattle, sheep and goat, wheat, barley, millet, and even kefir cheese. Buried in boat coffins in an otherwise barren desert, the Tarim Basin mummies have long puzzled scientists and inspired numerous theories as to their enigmatic origins. "


(Cant qoute the rest of the article, but If you want to take a look, there you go)

That particularly study has little to do with the topic discussed.
 
Joined Jun 2012
15,528 Posts | 2,868+
Malaysia
All of the above, its not exactly hard to tell the difference between these to groups just by looking at them.
Well, let's just put it this way. Let's just say that you come across two different Tarim mummies.

One with light coloured hair and eyes, but an otherwise rather unstriking roundy sort of face, short small relatively unprominent nose. Then another one with much darker hair and eyes and skin, but more sharp featured face, with prominent aquiline nose, and striking jawline.

Which type would you consider as more 'European featured'?
 
Joined Jun 2014
17,822 Posts | 9,478+
Lisbon, Portugal
The Indo-Iranian language family is originated from the people related with the Sintashta/Andronovo cultural complexes, which they're the descendants of the people related with the Corded-Ware cultural complex in Central/Northern Europe. So yeah, you can make the case that they are related to "Europeans".
 
Joined Jun 2022
3,748 Posts | 1,350+
Norway
Well, let's just put it this way. Let's just say that you come across two Tarim mummies.

One with light coloured hair and eyes, but an otherwise rather unstriking roundy face, short small relatively unprominent nose. Then another one with much darker hair and eyes and skin, but more sharp featured face, with prominent aquiline nose, and striking jawline.

Which type would you consider as more 'European featured'?
I cant answer you, because as far as i am aware, neither of these phenotypes excists.
 
Joined Jun 2012
15,528 Posts | 2,868+
Malaysia
I cant answer you, because as far as i am aware, neither of these phenotypes excists.
Oh yeah? Really?

Very well then, in that case that could also mean that you either ain't travelled around all that much, or your powers of observation might not be as sharp as you believe them to be.

Fact being, not a few northern or middle Europeans have the former look, while conversely not a few Iranians, Pakistani, Azerbaijani or western Uzbek have the latter features.

I have actually seen many of both types, at close range too, so I'm not just saying it for the sake of saying it.
 
Joined Jun 2022
3,748 Posts | 1,350+
Norway
Oh yeah? Really?

Very well then, in that case that could also mean that you either ain't travelled around all that much, or your powers of observation might not be as sharp as you believe them to be.

Fact being, not a few northern or middle Europeans have the former look, while conversely not a few Iranians, Pakistani, Azerbaijani or western Uzbek have the latter features.

I have actually seen many of both types, at close range too, so I'm not just saying it for the sake of saying it.
My friend, im norwegian and have seen tens of thousands of northren europeans in my life. None of then have that look. Ofc, there are mixed people, half asian and half european, but thats another story.
 
Joined Jun 2012
15,528 Posts | 2,868+
Malaysia
Last edited:
Kristanna Lokken? She's full Norwegian, right?

I mean, she's still a hawt babe, I grant. I quite like her too.

But then, my friend, just for talking's sake, I have also met many Iranians, Pakistani and western Uzbek with a, well, much more, shall I say, much more aristocratic nose?

What I'm getting at is that, there is no such thing as one single archetypal look that represents all Europeans, nor another single look that describes all Asians, or even just all western Asians.
 
Joined Jun 2022
3,748 Posts | 1,350+
Norway
Kristanna Lokken?

I mean, she's still a hawt babe, I grant. I quite like her too.

But then, my friend, just for talking's sake, I have also met many Iranians, Pakistani and western Uzbek with a, well, much more, shall I say, much more aristocratic nose?
If you are reffering to what we call eagle nose, that is not an northren european feature.
 
Status
Archived

Trending History Discussions

Top