Who was the common soldier in the American Civil War?

Joined Jun 2006
1,365 Posts | 18+
Jacksonville, FL
Here's what the statistics tell us.

By Eric Ethier


How Many Fought
About 2.75 million soldiers fought in the Civil War -- million for the North and 750,000 for the South.

The Average Soldier
According to historian Bell I. Wiley, who pioneered the study of the Civil War common soldier, the average Yank or Reb was a "white, native-born, farmer, protestant, single, between 18 and 29." He stood about 5 feet 8 inches tall and weighed about 143 pounds. Most soldiers were between the ages of 18 and 39 with an average age just under 26.

Making a Living
The majority of soldiers North and South had been farmers before the war. Union rosters contained references to more than 300 different careers, including accountant, surveyor, locksmith, teacher, carpenter, shoemaker, black- smith, painter, mason, teamster, and mechanic. Southerners who had not farmed included carpenters, mechanics, merchants, machinists, lawyers, teachers, blacksmiths, and dentists.

Rifle, Carbine, or Cannon?
In the Union army, 80 percent of the men were in the infantry, 14 percent in the cavalry, and 6 percent in artillery. In the Confederate army, 75 percent of the men served in the infantry, 20 percent in the cavalry, and 5 percent in artillery.

The Odds Against Them
Of every 1,000 Feder-als, 112 were wounded; 150 of every 1,000 Confederates were hit. A Yankee stood a 1 in 8 chance of dying due to illness and a 1 in 18 chance of dying in battle. A Rebel faced a 1 in 5 chance of succumbing to disease and a 1 in 8 chance of dying in combat.

Taps
360,000 Yankees died—110,000 in battle and 225,000 of disease. The South lost 258,000 men—94,000 in battle and 164,000 to disease.

Prisoners of War
Roughly 211,000 Union soldiers were captured and imprisoned in the South; 30,000 of them died there. 214,000 Confederates were imprisoned in the North, and 26,000 of them died.

Why They Fought
Men on both sides were inspired to fight by patriotism, state pride, the chance for adventure, or steady pay. Union soldiers fought to preserve the Union; the common Confederate fought to defend his home. Later in the war, increasing numbers of Yankee soldiers fought to abolish slavery, if for no other reason than to end the war quickly. Confederate soldiers sometimes fought because they feared Union victory would result in a society where black people were placed on an even footing with whites.

Army Melting Pots
The large majority of Civil War soldiers were native born. Nonetheless, large numbers of stout-hearted newcomers to the country also volunteered to fight—especially in the North. Nearly one quarter of the Union's soldiers were immigrants, including 200,000 Ger-mans; 150,000 Irish; 45,000 English; 15,000 Canadians, and lesser numbers of French, Norwegians, Italians, Mexicans, and Poles. Exact figures for the South are sketchy, but tens of thousands of Irish, Germans, British, French, Canadians, Dutch, and Austrians entered Confederate ranks.

Black Troops
By war's end, African-American soldiers made up roughly 10 percent of the Union army. Approximately 179,000 black soldiers wore the blue; 37,000 lost their lives. In March 1865, the Confederate congress authorized the army to recruit 300,000 black troops. Some units were raised, but it was too late for them to make a difference.

Soothing the Savage ......
Johnny Reb and Billy Yank loved to sing—on the march, in camp, and sometimes even in battle. The men in blue favored "Battle Cry of Freedom," "Red White and Blue," "The Star Spangled Banner," and others. The men in gray cherished "Dixie," "Bonnie Blue Flag," "Yellow Rose of Texas," and other songs. Both sides were moved by the heartbreaking tune "Home Sweet Home."

Mess Time
"What breakfast could possibly compare with this," Union Lieutenant Theodore Ayrault Dodge wrote in his journal in 1862—"hard crackers, boiled beef (2 days in the haversack) and bologna sausage (ditto)." Officially, the daily Union ration consisted of 22 ounces of bread and either 12 ounces of pork or a pound of salted beef. Confederates were supposed to be supplied (but seldom were) with 12 ounces of bacon or 20 ounces of beef (usually salted) along with 18 ounces of flour or 20 ounces of corn meal or hard bread. Vegetables such as beans and peas often proved hard to come by, especially for the Rebs. Usually, Yankees banked on hardtack and coffee, while their counterparts tried to get by on corn bread and coffee. Men on both sides got what they could from sutlers or foraging. Coffee and tobacco were common cravings.

The Wages of War
Soldiers on each side initially earned $11 per month. In June 1864, the Confederacy raised each soldier's pay to $18 per month, a sum worth less and less as the Confederate dollar dropped in value. That same month the Union upgraded its soldiers' monthly wage to $16. Black soldiers were initially paid just $10 per month—minus the $3 clothing allowance that white troops received. After June 1864, black soldiers who had been free men before the war were paid the same as whites, but recently freed slaves who joined the army's ranks did not get the raise.

Passing the Time
Soldiers had to deal with much boredom. To fill the hours, Yanks and Rebels wrote letter after letter to family, friends, and sweethearts. In spite of the warnings of officers, bouts of drinking and especially gambling broke out. Soldiers played checkers, chess, and baseball, whittled and carved, and if they were feeling particularly creative, would even put on plays. Tennessean Sam Watkins described one winter diversion: "Brigades and divisions were soon involved, and such a scene was never before seen on earth. Many thousands of men were engaged in a snow ball battle." Both sides read whatever they could get their hands on: Yankees favored Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper, Harper's Weekly, American Review, and The Atlantic. Confederates read Southern Illustrated News, Southern Literary Messenger, and Field and Fireside. Both sides loved dime novels and the Bible.

Dirt and Disease
Whenever armies remained settled in camp, sanitary conditions worsened. For starters, until later in the war, latrines were often built upwind. Accumulation over time created an unpleasant and unhealthy environment. Eventually, refuse from cooking and slaughtered animals began to cover the ground, and the local water source often became fouled. Disease spread rapidly.

Religion
Both armies claimed to be fighting with God's blessing, and religion played a big part in the lives of many soldiers. "Sometimes, a few of the fellows would gather in prayer, while the rest of us fought the guns," wrote Confederate soldier William M. Dame. "Several times...we met under fire...we held that prayer hour every day, at sunset, during the entire campaign." While the slaughter and grief of war drove some men from their faith, religious revivals swept through both armies, claiming thousands of converts. Most of the men were Christian, though 7,000 Jews fought for the Union and 3,000 for the South. 600 Jewish soldiers died in the war.
 
Joined Jun 2006
165 Posts | 0+
celtman
Thanks for that GREAT post. I remember us talking about deaths in a previous thread.

Taps
360,000 Yankees died—110,000 in battle and 225,000 of disease. The South lost 258,000 men—94,000 in battle and 164,000 to disease.

Amazing.
 
Joined Oct 2009
23,286 Posts | 99+
Maryland
Contrary to Lost Cause mythology, he was probably a farm-boy regardless which side he fought for.

Chances are he was also a white Protestant in his early twenties, and with German or Anglo-Celtic ancestry. Of course, that is a broad generalization - African Americans, Latin Americans, Irish, Scandinavian, Italian, Slavic, and even Chinese immigrants, Jews, Roman Catholics, and the odd Muslim all found their way into the ranks of Civil War armies. Men as young as nine and as old as eighty-three are on record.

The (predominately Irish) Catholics numbered in the tens of thousands in the Union Army, and an estimated 10,000 Jews fought on each side. Supposedly, at least thirty individuals with the first name Muhammad have been found in the paper work of the Federal Armed Forces during the War. A Chinese immigrant - complete with the stereotypical pigtails - was killed while serving an artillery piece on the Union side at Gettysburg.
 
Joined Mar 2009
25,361 Posts | 13+
Texas
Contrary to Hyper-Union mythology and the defeated Southern soldier, both
sides quickly came to realize that war is not the glorious, flag waving, parade
route lined with cheering crowds tossing flowers as the soldiers passed by.
War is messy, dirty, scary, and not full of the glory and excitement they read
about in History books.
 
Joined Oct 2009
23,286 Posts | 99+
Maryland
Well said TJ. I recall both suicide and divorce rates skyrocketing amongst the country's white males in the decade after the War. Clearly the Civil War left psychological scars, personal as well as regional and national, that endured long after the guns silenced.
 
Joined Jul 2009
11,426 Posts | 1,453+
Well said TJ. I recall both suicide and divorce rates skyrocketing amongst the country's white males in the decade after the War. Clearly the Civil War left psychological scars, personal as well as regional and national, that endured long after the guns silenced.

During the war, "shell shock" was often viewed as cowardice. After the war, your emotional and marital problems were viewed as something being morally wrong with you.

PTSD was still in the future medical vocabulary.
 
Joined Jan 2013
412 Posts | 1+
Mountain View N.M.
Last edited:
Contrary to Hyper-Union mythology and the defeated Southern soldier, both
sides quickly came to realize that war is not the glorious, flag waving, parade
route lined with cheering crowds tossing flowers as the soldiers passed by.
War is messy, dirty, scary, and not full of the glory and excitement they read
about in History books.


I agree. But in actuality as it relates to the ACW insofar as recent history; they already knew that viz a vie the Mexican American War and the early Indian campaigns.
 
Joined Mar 2011
1,986 Posts | 1+
Bulgaria
According to historian Andre Moroa, the Union soldiers were mostly drafted from the cities, while the Confederacy was renowned for being a mainly agriculture state, so your most common Confederate soldier was from the farms or villages and very skillful at hunting which gave him a great superiority over his Northern enemy.
 
Joined Aug 2010
8,654 Posts | 844+
VA
According to historian Andre Moroa, the Union soldiers were mostly drafted from the cities, while the Confederacy was renowned for being a mainly agriculture state, so your most common Confederate soldier was from the farms or villages and very skillful at hunting which gave him a great superiority over his Northern enemy.
And neither you nor Moroa cite any evidence for this claim, so it's entirely meaningless.
 
Joined Aug 2010
8,654 Posts | 844+
VA
I cite Moroa and it is up to him to find his sources. How many history books have you published?
You can cite all the secondary sources you damn well please, but if that source doesn't have so much as a scrap of evidence for the claim it makes, it's worthless. Tell me, does Moroa have any footnotes that tell you where he got this information? Perhaps in the notes at the end of the book?
 
Joined Jul 2009
11,426 Posts | 1,453+
Last edited:
According to historian Andre Moroa, the Union soldiers were mostly drafted from the cities, while the Confederacy was renowned for being a mainly agriculture state, so your most common Confederate soldier was from the farms or villages and very skillful at hunting which gave him a great superiority over his Northern enemy.

That isn't correct. Both North and South were overwhelmingly agricultural in the 1860s. Most Union soldiers were volunteers from rural areas.

I don't know who Andre Moroa is, but he may be confusing draft riots in New York City (July, 1863) with the usual origins of Civil War soldiers. The war had become more complex and costly than anticipated, and a draft law was enacted in spring, 1863 to keep the armies at full strength.

New York City experienced violent civil unrest, much of it among immigrants (Irish, German) as they could not afford the $300 it took to provide a substitute - that spared many wealthier people. One result of the draft and the NY riots was the enlisting of black troops in their own regiments (white officers), which raised about 180,000 volunteers through the end of the war.

In fact, out of about 2,000,000 (1861-1865 total) Union troops, around 450,000 came from the state of New York, and the vast majority were volunteers from rural backgrounds. The 'western' Union states were all agricultural at the time, and they provided nearly all the troops in the western campaigns.

By a wide margin Union soldiers were volunteers. In 1864, when many enlistments were expiring, the number of re-enlistments was surprisingly high.
 
Joined Oct 2012
5,637 Posts | 418+
US
Last edited:
Good post, OP!

Although I would add one other popular diversion that was missing from the Passing the Time section: brothels and camp followers. The soldiers on both sides weren't just chaste God-fearing farm boys. : )

Erotic Victorian-era literature known as barracks favorites were also popular amongst the troops, as were nude photographs of women known as French postcards.
 
Joined Mar 2009
25,361 Posts | 13+
Texas
By a wide margin Union soldiers were volunteers. In 1864, when many enlistments were expiring, the number of re-enlistments was surprisingly high.

True. I find some humor in the Union draft. It reminds me of a
boss and an employee in an argument and the boss says, "You're fired".
The employee replies, "You can't fire me, I quit." Same end result.
The Union's mandatory draft call for able bodied men 18-35, resulted in
a tally of over 700,000 qualified men. If you're going to be drafted, might as
well just join up either from shame, peer pressure or duty: same end result. :)
 
Joined Jan 2013
412 Posts | 1+
Mountain View N.M.
You can cite all the secondary sources you damn well please, but if that source doesn't have so much as a scrap of evidence for the claim it makes, it's worthless. Tell me, does Moroa have any footnotes that tell you where he got this information? Perhaps in the notes at the end of the book?


Correct. Without credible primary and secondary sources a published work regardless of it's being published is worthless; unless it's an attempt at revisionism at worst-speculation at best. Peer review is equally important.

Neither is necessarily of value.
 
Joined Mar 2011
1,986 Posts | 1+
Bulgaria
You can cite all the secondary sources you damn well please, but if that source doesn't have so much as a scrap of evidence for the claim it makes, it's worthless. Tell me, does Moroa have any footnotes that tell you where he got this information? Perhaps in the notes at the end of the book?

No, when it comes from a renowned historian, what they say always counts. You can't just ignore sources like that just because you don't like them, like you did with Mr. Wister. Then maybe I will start saying what Simpson says about Grant doesn't count as well :evil:

And about the book - I lost the second part of it. I just have so many books, I sometimes lose track them. Literally.
 
Joined Jul 2011
11,340 Posts | 2,849+
The US was primarily agricultural at that time. The deep south had almost no industry, relying on cotton and other cash crops. Virginia and the border states were fairly similar to the north with industry and significant cities.

A large part of the Confederate forces were conscripts. Late in the war they were drafting white men 17-50. The Union draft was implemented later and was not that effective.

The southern soldiers were generally better shots, horsemen and so on initially, so that didn't make up for the north's advantages of industry and manpower.
 
Joined Oct 2011
3,785 Posts | 74+
Cloud City
...both sides quickly came to realize that war is not the glorious, flag waving, parade route lined with cheering crowds tossing flowers as the soldiers passed by.




War is messy, dirty, scary, and not full of the glory and excitement they read about in History books.



C'mon now. Which would you use for a recruiting poster?


In complete agreement with tjadams' point here, of course...
 
Joined Jul 2012
3,994 Posts | 348+
According to historian Andre Moroa, the Union soldiers were mostly drafted from the cities, while the Confederacy was renowned for being a mainly agriculture state, so your most common Confederate soldier was from the farms or villages and very skillful at hunting which gave him a great superiority over his Northern enemy.

From this it is clear Mr. Maurois is profoundly ignorant of the subject he is writing about.

Confederate soldiers were far more likely to draftees
. The Confederacy instituted the draft in April 1862, the Union not till a year later. The Union draft applied to men aged 20-45 in areas that had not filled their troops quotas. The Confederate draft applied to men ages 17-50, unless they owned 20 or more slaves, regardless of how many troops their state had already furnished. In the Confederacy, 18% of all troops were draftees. In the Union, only 6% if the troops were draftees.

The Confederate soldier was more like to be a farmer than his Union counterpart (69% vs 48%), but there's no evidence this translated into superior combat skills.
 
Joined Aug 2010
8,654 Posts | 844+
VA
No, when it comes from a renowned historian, what they say always counts. You can't just ignore sources like that just because you don't like them, like you did with Mr. Wister. Then maybe I will start saying what Simpson says about Grant doesn't count as well :evil:

And about the book - I lost the second part of it. I just have so many books, I sometimes lose track them. Literally.
Simpson sources all the specific claims he makes, with notes, footnotes, etc. Maurois apparently doesn't.
 

Trending History Discussions

Top