Joined Apr 2010
50,502 Posts | 11,794+
Awesome
- Status
But it is up to a point when at least half of other members using the Asian history subforum misinterpret his ideas. But I suggest him to write better English for others, so that wouldn't be problem.
Joined Sep 2013
1,082 Posts | 9+
Tokyo
Joined Sep 2013
1,082 Posts | 9+
Tokyo
Joined Apr 2010
50,502 Posts | 11,794+
Awesome
Hey, smoking in public is still legal in Japan! Or was he walking and self-immolating at the same time?
Last edited:
IF in history is not a real history. it is a just story. that is why i say korean history is fantasy that korean wants.
if not, Korea would be Russian. this was more reality
IF IF IF.. get a life. I japan won ww2 then Korean is still Japanese citizen?
i
Joined Jun 2012
6,680 Posts | 786+
Texas
What does your friend say about China now ramming Vietnamese ships and saying it owns all the waters from the Phillipiness to Vietnam?
Joined Sep 2013
1,082 Posts | 9+
Tokyo
Last edited:
Hey, smoking in public is still legal in Japan! Or was he walking and self-immolating at the same time?
He's only getting charged with mis use of fire in a public place now.
Last edited:
There really should be a rule in Historum that bans empty comments with absolutely no logical and historical proof. There's a perfect example here, lol
Last edited:
I think so like your empty comment
oops I did it againat least, History besed on "IF" is fantasy, right
that is why It needs document, Pics and videos at that time. history is not belief.
it must not use fabrication of history for politics
also witness is not an evidence. it needs certain proof
We can arguably say that history is written by the victors. So yes, the whole idea of history can reasonably have fantasy-like elements.
So according to you, history must be in a form of documents, pictures, and videos. Or else everything must be a kind of fantasy if one of them disappears.
Correct me if I'm wrong; I think it's a very limited way of viewing the history of certain groups of people or certain regions.
history is relative. there are so many aspect of view from many directions
however it need an certain evidence .
I think so like your empty comment
at least, History besed on "IF" is fantasy, right
that is why It needs document, Pics and videos at that time. history is not belief.
it must not use fabrication of history for politics
also witness is not an evidence. it need certain proof
I must agree with needstability, your English in this post is so horrible I can't understand what you're saying. This is not meant as an insult but an advice.
Now, back to the point. You keep saying Korean history is a fantasy-may I ask you to prove it? That is what I meant by an 'empty comment', you know.
Joined Jun 2014
4,516 Posts | 85+
India
Are you honestly not understanding his English or just insulting his English? Everything he said is well understood to me and I am sure any other person will say same. Let us remember that English is not our first language so it is obvious that we will make mistakes initially.
Evidences can always be subjective because we human beings are not perfect and we can always make bad judgments of understanding evidences. In this case, people will always have strong or weak agendas or maybe even none. And they will never look at evidences perfectly.
For example, Benjamin Fulford reasonably proved that the majority of Japanese Prime Ministers after World War II were North Korean spies who worked for international banks based on several of his books in Japanese. And yet, most of the people think he is crazy because most of them ignored the historical evidences. Why is that?
Attachments
- Status
More History Discussions
Trending History Discussions
-
The Great Captains of History - How Many Battles? - Version 7- Started by DiocletianIsBetterThanYou
- Replies: 861
-
-
The Great Captains of History - How Many Battles? - Version 5
- Started by DiocletianIsBetterThanYou
- Replies: 3K
-
The Diversity Of Early African Architecture/Ruins Thread- Started by Kilwa Sultanate
- Replies: 2K
-