What battles in US war History do you think were the deadlist?

Joined Jul 2012
2,600 Posts | 0+
Somewhere
I have 3 attacks or battles that were deadly and costed a lot of US tooper's lifes.

1. Peral Harbor(1941)-Surprise attack by the Japanese many US Navey soldiers died that day

2.Tet Offensive(1968)-Surprise attack by the Viet Cong and North Vietnam it sparked many protests for the U.S. to back out of the Vietnam war.

3.Battle of Gettysburg(1863)-A well thought out attack carried on by the Confederate States. Altho it was a Union victory the North lost many soldiers.

What other battles do you think were the deadlist in U.S. war History?
 
Joined Oct 2009
23,286 Posts | 99+
Maryland
For the Civil War, Antietam was the single bloodiest day of the conflict, though the Wilderness and Spotsylvania Courthouse were particularly miserable battles to fight at as well. One could say the same thing about Franklin/Nashville - if you were a Rebel:)
 
Joined Aug 2010
8,654 Posts | 844+
VA
Last edited:
Emperor Trajan said:
3.Battle of Gettysburg(1863)-A well thought out attack carried on by the Confederate States. Altho it was a Union victory the North lost many soldiers.
Gettysburg was not a well-thought out battle for the Confederates, and the casualties, although relatively close in absolute numbers, were far worse proportionately for the Confederates.

For a day that rivals Antietam in sheer bloodshed that doesn't receive much attention, the fighting on the third day of the Battle of Chancellorsville was absolutely horrific, definitely rivalling the Wilderness in the same terrain a year later. That day is when the great majority of the battle's 30,000 casualties fell.

If I'm doing my math right, the casualties for the third day at Chancellorsville and Antietam are actually pretty darn close; in Chancellorsville, 2,500 Union soldiers plus an indeterminate number of Jackson's men fell on the second day. There wasn't much heavy fighting on the first day. 5,000 men fell at Salem Church. Let's assume that all comes out to 8,000 or thereabouts. With the fighting around Chancellorsville itself plus Second Fredericksburg on the same day, that brings the Chancellorsville, May 3rd casualties, to about the same as Antietam, 22,000, give or take several hundred.
 
Joined Jul 2010
7,575 Posts | 16+
Georgia, USA
WWII's Battle of the Bulge. A nearly six week affair that cost the Americans almost 90,000 total casualties, nearly 20,000 dead.
 
Joined Feb 2013
6,724 Posts | 28+
1) The Battle of the Wabash/St. Clair's defeat. Out of 1,000 soldiers, US survivors were in the double-digits.

Battle of the Wabash - Nortwest Indian War Battle of the Wabash

2) The Battle of Antietam, as the bloodiest single day of battle in the US Civil War.

3) The Battle of Stone's River as the bloodiest proportional battle in the entire war.

4) The Battle of Chickamauga, which was by some reckonings the second bloodiest battle of the entire war.
 
Joined Jun 2012
5,689 Posts | 2+
Hippy town U.S.A.!
Basing a battle on time alone, the battle of the Alamo & San Jacinto have to rank in there.
The Alamo battle (1836) lasted just about one hour with an est. 600 Mexican soldiers killed
and almost 200 Texians.
crockett-alamo.jpg

The San Jacinto battle lasted about eighteen minutes with an est. 600 Mexican soldiers killed and about nine Texians killed in this one.
sanjacinto.gif

Not sure those count as the bloodiest. . .
 
Joined Oct 2009
23,286 Posts | 99+
Maryland
Not sure those count as the bloodiest. . .

It counts in my book and that's all that matters .

Using the words of the OP, this thread is to give examples of battles that were bloody and cost the lives of lots of American soldiers. The Alamo definitely qualifies on both ends, while San Jacinto also applies for the first half of that criteria. Indeed, TJ named two of the most important battles in the conflict that gave America it's most badass state - so they're worthy in my book:cool:
 
Joined Apr 2013
329 Posts | 0+
Wisconsin
WWII's Battle of the Bulge. A nearly six week affair that cost the Americans almost 90,000 total casualties, nearly 20,000 dead.

I'm an American Legion post commander(until tomorrow,when I pass the reins to the NEXT .....),as well as a County Officer,and I serve with one of the last Battle of the Bulge veterans in Wisconsin.He is quite a character,and has told me plenty of tales of his time with the 101st,both at the Bulge and at Arnhem.He collected three purple hearts,and two Bronze Stars along the way.His grand daughter is currently writing a book about his experiences,and his story needs to be told.
 
Joined Dec 2012
538 Posts | 0+
New York
The Battle of the Bulge in 1944 (WWII), with 90,000+ estimated casualties for the U.S.



colmar_casualties.jpg
 
Joined Jul 2012
2,600 Posts | 0+
Somewhere
Gettysburg was not a well-thought out battle for the Confederates, and the casualties, although relatively close in absolute numbers, were far worse proportionately for the Confederates.

For a day that rivals Antietam in sheer bloodshed that doesn't receive much attention, the fighting on the third day of the Battle of Chancellorsville was absolutely horrific, definitely rivalling the Wilderness in the same terrain a year later. That day is when the great majority of the battle's 30,000 casualties fell.

If I'm doing my math right, the casualties for the third day at Chancellorsville and Antietam are actually pretty darn close; in Chancellorsville, 2,500 Union soldiers plus an indeterminate number of Jackson's men fell on the second day. There wasn't much heavy fighting on the first day. 5,000 men fell at Salem Church. Let's assume that all comes out to 8,000 or thereabouts. With the fighting around Chancellorsville itself plus Second Fredericksburg on the same day, that brings the Chancellorsville, May 3rd casualties, to about the same as Antietam, 22,000, give or take several hundred.

How did the Confederates almost win if it was not well thought out?
 
Joined Jul 2010
7,575 Posts | 16+
Georgia, USA
I'm an American Legion post commander(until tomorrow,when I pass the reins to the NEXT .....),as well as a County Officer,and I serve with one of the last Battle of the Bulge veterans in Wisconsin.He is quite a character,and has told me plenty of tales of his time with the 101st,both at the Bulge and at Arnhem.He collected three purple hearts,and two Bronze Stars along the way.His grand daughter is currently writing a book about his experiences,and his story needs to be told.
Outstanding! Please give a heads up when it comes out, Sarge. Btw... what the hell is AirCav doing hanging out with Airborne? In my day, that made for bad nights for many club owners! :lol:
 
Joined Apr 2013
329 Posts | 0+
Wisconsin
Outstanding! Please give a heads up when it comes out, Sarge. Btw... what the hell is AirCav doing hanging out with Airborne? In my day, that made for bad nights for many club owners! :lol:

Well,we're all brothers,in the Legion-and I'm turning over the command slot to a Coastie......
 
Joined Oct 2012
5,637 Posts | 418+
US
The Meuse-Argonne Offensive during the First World War.

It is arguably the bloodiest single 'battle' in American military history, and in the U.S. hardly anyone has ever heard of it. Between September 26th, 1918 and November 11th, 1918 the U.S. suffered a total of 117,000 casualties, 26,277 of which were KIA or died of wounds.

Although far less well known than the Normandy cemetery and visited much less frequently by tourists, the Meuse-Argonne American Cemetery and Memorial remains the largest cemetery for American war dead in Europe.
 
Joined Apr 2013
329 Posts | 0+
Wisconsin
Outstanding! Please give a heads up when it comes out, Sarge. Btw... what the hell is AirCav doing hanging out with Airborne? In my day, that made for bad nights for many club owners! :lol:

Hey,even worse was when units from 3rd armored and 11th ACR ended up in the same bar.I started out as an artilleryman in 3rd Armored,and if we saw some Blackhorse guys,Top would take a swing-oh crap,Top's at it again...get 'em,boys......
 
Joined Aug 2010
8,654 Posts | 844+
VA
Well, to be fair, they routed Sickles's corps and came close to capturing Little Round Top, which, had this happened, probably would have forced the Union army to retreat.
I don't think so. The Confederates, at most, could have put a couple thousand men on top of Little Round Top on July 2nd; Meade had the entire Union VI Corps arriving late in the day, and probably could have forced the Confederates right back off the hill. And Little Round Top's importance is somewhat exaggerated; it only became as important as it did because of Sickles' unauthorized advance uncovering it. It's useless as an artillery platform facing north, and you could only get one battery on it anyway. Holding it with a couple of thousand fought-out troops wouldn't have made the Union position untenable in and of itself; Meade had the entire VI Corps arriving in the day, and probably could have swept the Confederates off the hill again.

The closest the Confederates came to victory was the result of two complete accidents they had no control over; Sickles' unauthorized advance, which enabled Longstreet to smash him and wreak havoc on the Union left for a time, and Slocum overreacting to Meade's request for reinforcements by sending almost the entire XII Corps off Culp's Hill on the Union right. The men remaining on Culp's Hill against the assault of Johnson's Confederate division were actually up against greater odds than those on Little Round Top, the position's loss would have made the entire Union line untenable and exposed the Baltimore Pike, and the regiment holding the extreme right, the 137th New York under David Ireland, actually made two bayonet charges and refused their flank to stave off overwhelming Confederate force.
 
Joined May 2009
14,691 Posts | 61+
A tiny hamlet in the Carolina Sandhills
How did the Confederates almost win if it was not well thought out?

They didn't. Especially after the first day, there was no real chance of a Confederate victory. That's what makes Lee's decisions so inexplicable.
 

Trending History Discussions

Top