Egypt had relations with the greeks. there is a lot of reports. I would be surprised, if they could remember back to 11000 BC, but forgot the migration of the greek peoples to Greece. And we do not only need an Athens at 9000 BC, no, we need a powerful Athens. There is not a single evidence for this.
We know for certain that the Egyptians had relations with the Greeks at the time of Plato and also there are indications that they also had had relations with the previous Myceneans and the Minoans as well. But we simply do not know much about whom or what the Egyptians knew about before 6,000 BCE. This is because there are no written records that have survived. Whatever information about Atlantis that the Egyptians may have had either has not yet been discovered or is either lost or currently existing but not recognized.
There very well could have been a strong people (a seafaring one) residing at the site of Athens, but no records of these people so far exist. Just as no records of Gobekli Tepe existed previously either, but there Gobekli Tepe is.
attempts to record informations? We need a completely recorded myth about Atlantis, not an attempt to record information or some images.
We do have a "completely recorded" myth about Atlantis. It is called the Timaeus and Critias dialogues by Plato. And this is not an "attempt to record information." These accounts were written by one of the most respected philosophers of the ancient Hellenistic world. However, it is the only complete record we currently have. Or that survives. Where there was absolutely nothing on Gobekli Tepe, whatsoever. That Gobekli Tepe and all the other Anatolian sites now being uncovered existed so far back in unrecorded time (to the time of Atlantis) indicates or suggests that other places within the Greek-Turkey region could have also existed. Including a seafaring people residing at or near the vicinity of Athens. However, those people residing in this potential Athens would have been destroyed, as would all other coastal residing peoples around the Atlantic by the colossal tsunami created by the sinking of Atlantis into the sea. The most interesting thing about the dating of Gobekli Tepe is that it appears to have arisen very shortly after the time Plato stated Atlantis sank into the sea. Gobekli Tepe could have been created by survivors from Atlantis or at least their descendants. Further research there may reveal much that was never suspected about human capabilities 12,000 years ago.
What do you mean with advanced? If you have an "advanced" Atlantis, you need as well an advanced Egypt to record the story and an "advanced" athens to beat Alantis. and all these advanced cultures disappeared nearly completely, just with these myth left? Göbekli Tepe is a great archaeological site and "advanced" compared with other regions, but still neolithic.
Having an advanced Atlantis does not imply or require any "advanced" Egypt or an "advanced" Athens. You do not support this opinion with any rationale. The US is advanced but most other countries in the world are not as advanced and many (at least huge parts) are still just as primitive as they were 5000 years ago. According to Plato (or the priests of Sais) Atlantis was a colonizing civilization and quite a hostile one. Any people overcome by Atlantis were most likely oppressed and severely controlled. Whatever "advancements" were invented by Atlantis were also severely controlled, just as the silk creating process of China was strictly controlled for centuries. The mythos by Plato does say the Athenians ended up defeating the Atlanteans, but does not fully explain how or why this was done. If the US suddenly sank into the ocean, it wouldn't be long before our overseas forces would be overcome by hostile forces. And I hope one doesn't have to explain why or what would be obvious.
we have sculptures like the venus of willendorf, 25k years old
and we have other findings, too. Nevertheless had we not mythically advanced cultures all over europe.
Except that we do have an advanced culture in Anatolia, which borders Europe. One dated at the same time as Atlantis and one where no "record" of it previously existed. Where there is one unknown civilization, lost to history, there could also be many others. We just have to find them. There are many in the round sculptures, that have been discovered all over Europe. Some are very crude and some extremely refined and date back to twice the age of Gobekli Tepe. Which suggests that there may be much about European sculptural capability we are not aware of. Gobekli Tepe, however. is the first example of advanced architectonic structures with bas-relief carving of high sophistication and very advanced stoneworking. And this technology exists contemporaneously near the exact timeline of Atlantis. Who knew?
The mythological Atlas, the map Atlas, the mountain range, the continent Atlantis, the Atlantic ocean, an Aztec Aztlan. And? Do all have the same roots. We don't know what Atlantis means, if it is the original name of these people (if they existed) or egyptian or of any other origin. Atlas means "heaver". If Atlantis means "Isle without name", there is absolutely no connection with both. It is the same with the mountain range. The native name seems to be different. So it got its greek name by the myth of Atlas. This is the same with the ocean. And the map is even named by somebody else than the Greek Atlas. The aztec Aztlan means probably land of the white bird. But the aztec culture is not at all 12,000 years old.
I seriously doubt if "Atlantis" was the name spoken by the people who lived on the lost continent. It is obviously a Greek term. One based on their mythological Atlas (a mythological concept that could, itself, have originated on Atlantis). All the sources giving reference to the Atlantic, the Atlas mountains or any people living near or in these places are Greek references. Terms which were eventually latinized and even later turned into english. However, this doesn't mean that a word similar sounding or related to "Atlantis" might have been passed down to the Egyptians, the Moroccans, finally to the Greeks and even to the Aztecs. A word similar to Atlas. The shorter a word is the more easily and reliably transmissible it becomes by oral means. This mythos must have been principally passed by oral transmission once Atlantis was subsumed by the ocean. Or remained recorded by surviving Atlanteans themselves. Whom the Egyptians may be directly, culturally connected to. However, once the capability of recording it was possible it would have then become a reasonably permanent impression of this mythos. We simply do not have any of these recordings or do not yet recognize them as such. And this story may exist in many evolved, convoluted and related forms all over the world.
As to the history of the Aztecs, we do not know how far back in history their mythology goes, where it originated or the credibility of their legends. There are peoples, currently residing in the US, whose history goes back to ancient India, Egypt, Europe, Polynesia, Africa and all points in between. Their mythos still lives in these transported peoples. Moreover, there is also a large contingent of native peoples, whose past extends back to the time 12,000 years ago, when humans crossed the Bering land bridge from Asia. Or possibly some (a very few)also could have come here to escape the destruction of a sinking continent.
it is hear-saying. Why should we assume it as correct? How could Plato check the myth? Yes, the library with all its secrets. I would love to see this library, but I strongly suppose, that the myth about it, is as well bigger than the reality
Everything is myth until proven to be factual. And myths do and can become "bigger than reality." However, within every myth lies the truth of its origin. The destruction of the Great Library and all its' knowledge was one of the worst crimes against knowledge in human history on a par with the almost complete destruction of the Mayan codices. Thousands of documents, in both cases; that recorded aspects of human history, are now lost forever. We can only surmise what might have been lost and hope that certain documents may possibly still exist. Documents still intact and hidden somewhere in lost or secret alcoves. Soon to be discovered "Dead Sea" scrolls about Atlantis. Maybe the still remaining buried portion of Gobekli Tepe (about 90%) will offer up a few more answers.
