Hand to Hand Combat, American Civil War

Joined Feb 2014
134 Posts | 1+
Baltimore County, Maryland
How much hand to hand combat occurred during the American Civil War?

In which battles was it prominent?

With the vast amount of trenches and hillside residences build in the South during the war, how were those individuals evicted? Hand to hand or did they just leave as the Union troops approached?
 
Joined Mar 2014
11,729 Posts | 3,505+
Beneath a cold sun, a grey sun, a Heretic sun...
How much hand to hand combat occurred during the American Civil War?

In which battles was it prominent?

With the vast amount of trenches and hillside residences build in the South during the war, how were those individuals evicted? Hand to hand or did they just leave as the Union troops approached?

If Paddy Griffith and Shelby Foote are to be believed, it was pretty rare. On the other hand, I know I've read some first-hand accounts of it. I'm of the opinion that it only occurred in situations where opponents found themselves well within the critical distance of "fight or flight" - at night, in confined spaces, etc.

I'm not well-versed in the Petersburg campaign, so I know next to nothing of the trench fighting situation there.
 
Joined Apr 2011
7,869 Posts | 349+
Georgia, USA
How much hand to hand combat occurred during the American Civil War?

In which battles was it prominent?

With the vast amount of trenches and hillside residences build in the South during the war, how were those individuals evicted? Hand to hand or did they just leave as the Union troops approached?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKRa966S5Dc&list=PLCA860ECD7F894424&index=7]A point about bayonets - YouTube[/ame]

Watch this...interesting what Lloyd has to say

Bayonets are a brutal weapon...and hand to hand combat is pretty nasty and bound to mentally scar any who survive it

Many accounts of the ACW though do speak of Union and Confederate infantry lining up against each other and conducting some kind of shooting match
 
Joined Oct 2009
23,286 Posts | 99+
Maryland
It certainly occurred, but it wasn't something a wise general or officer needed to factor into his battle plans. Seldom if ever was it a decisive factor in an engagement.

Veterans often joked that bayonets were more useful as cooking/eating utensils, entrenchment tools, even candle-holders, than they were as weapons. If I recall correctly, less than 1% of combat wounds were inflicted with bayonets. Of course, even in earlier centuries the bayonet seemed to have been more of a psychological than a physical weapon.

Edged weapons were still very much in the military mindset at the beginning of the Civil War. The famous abolitionist John Brown murdered several slave-owners with broadswords, and intended to equip his slave army with pikes. At the start of the War, all officers and many privates carried edged weapons with them. These ranged from gorgeous dress sabers, to crude bowie knives (the latter being a Confederate favorite in 1861).

Sabers were issued to most cavalry units on both sides, but like bayonets they tended to be used for decidedly non-lethal purposes, or discarded altogether. Nonetheless, there are a number of accounts of cavalrymen using sabers to good effect. The ruthless Confederate general Nathan Bedford Forrest killed several Northern men with his saber, and saber wounds were inflicted during the cavalry actions at Brandy Station and Gettysburg.

The 6th PA Volunteer Cavalry, known as 'Rush's Lancers', were originally equipped with spears and sabers. Despite the aura of romance surrounding this arsenal, the men of the regiment proved incompetent in melee combat. During one episode in the Peninsular Campaign, a unit of Confederates reportedly burst into a fit of hysterical laughter when the 6th Cavalry attempted to attack them. Eventually, they were issued carbines - and shortly thereafter, scored their first kills of the War.

There are many individual accounts of melee combat. At Gettysburg, in the Overland Campaign, and elsewhere, soldiers often preferred to bludgeon each other with rifle-butts rather than attempt to stab with bayonets. The famous military artist Don Troiani painted a scene, commemorating an incident during the Siege of Petersburg when an officer in a Vermont regiment killed a Rebel with his saber, and won the Medal of Honor as a result.

Some of the most terrible melee combat of the War took place at the Bloody Angle, during the series of battles around Spotsylvania Courthouse in May of 1864. One Union veteran recalled men attacking each other with rifle butts, bayonets, sabers, bowie knives, wood-chopping axes, and rocks. At Second Manassas, one Confederate brigade ran out of ammunition and held off a Union assault by hurling rocks.
 
Joined Sep 2013
1,082 Posts | 9+
Tokyo
In set peice, open field battles, bayonet fights were rare. Either the chargers or the defenders would break before contact or the attackers would slow down and start shooting.

If the defenders had a fixed position to defend. Anything from a wall to a redoubt it was more likely. In a Seige it was inevitable.
Bayonet fights when they happen are short, bloody...

Some historians like to show that it was very rare to see men with bayonet and sabre wounds. But this doesn't take into account that no one ever surveyed causes of death amongst KIA troops in this period. And bayonet fighting is more savage. It was bad form to shoot at wounded men, if they stayed down they were out of action, in a melee you kill. If the man you fight falls down injured you finish him off.
 
Joined Apr 2011
599 Posts | 0+
The Bluegrass
Since bayonet fighting is, by its nature, somewhat ageless more modern accounts of close combat are certainly acceptable. The most numerous recent accounts that I've come across stem from the Pacific in WWII. They are universally brutal, with any tool at hand being used. Rocks were popular, as were knives and rifle butts.
 
Joined Mar 2010
9,845 Posts | 31+
Last edited:
Since bayonet fighting is, by its nature, somewhat ageless more modern accounts of close combat are certainly acceptable. The most numerous recent accounts that I've come across stem from the Pacific in WWII. They are universally brutal, with any tool at hand being used. Rocks were popular, as were knives and rifle butts.

Soldier who led Afghanistan bayonet charge into hail of bullets honoured - Telegraph

Going a little off subject here but here's an interview and short piece about a boynet charge undertaken by British soldiers in Afghanistan in 2012.

Although from the sounds of things the Taliban ran away rather than engage in hand to hand (Can't really blame them)
 
Joined Feb 2012
5,934 Posts | 380+
Sabers were issued to most cavalry units on both sides, but like bayonets they tended to be used for decidedly non-lethal purposes, or discarded altogether.
Hi Salah - interesting point,. I assume then that firearms, carbines or pistols, were preferred, and that it illustrates the emphasis in tactics used by ACW cavalry?
 
Joined Mar 2014
11,729 Posts | 3,505+
Beneath a cold sun, a grey sun, a Heretic sun...
Although from the sounds of things the Taliban ran away rather than engage in hand to hand (Can't really blame them)

That would be the usual result from the invention of the bayonet until today. People don't like close-quarters fighting. The attacker or defender will tend to break and run before contact, unless they cannot.

The Union assaults on Marye's Heights at Fredericksburg and Missionary Ridge during the Chatanooga campaign serve for comparison. Both were assaults upon allegedly impregnable positions. At Marye's Heights, the Union attack faltered under the withering fire and the assaulting soldiers would not advance the final yards to engage hand-to-hand. At Missionary Ridge the Union attack carried through and the Confederate defenders abandoned their defensive line before the bayonet came into play, preferring flight over a bloody close-quarters combat.

During the Napoleonic wars, whether he was aware of the psychological effects of close combat or not, the Duke of Wellington made great use of it. Delivering a volley against advancing French columns followed by a spirited bayonet charge would break them more often than not.

It is difficult, however, to identify all the many intangibles that will produce one result over the other.
 
Joined Jan 2014
915 Posts | 9+
Virginia
It was pretty rare, although there were some well-known instances (like at the culmination of Pickett's Charge). Most hand-to-hand fighting involved trenches in some regard.
 

Trending History Discussions

Top